Cyclists Hub is supported by its readers. We might obtain a fee if you happen to purchase merchandise utilizing our hyperlinks.All content material on Cyclists Hub is written by people, not robots. Be taught Extra
At $499, the Magene P715 pedal energy meter looks as if a tempting possibility. However is it price it? I’ve been utilizing it for a couple of weeks and in contrast its accuracy to the Wahoo KICKR v5 good coach.
KEY TAKEAWAY
Utilizing the Welgo cleats I additionally use with the Favero Assioma DUO, Magene P715 pedals are a bit more durable to clip into. P715 pedals are additionally not as well-balanced, which typically prevents me from clipping into them on the primary strive. By way of accuracy, they constantly measured decrease energy than the Wahoo KICKR v5 by round -2.5%. Regardless of KICKR v5 being inside 1% of Favero Assioma DUO pedals, a 3rd energy supply could be wanted to confirm whether or not P715 is definitely exterior its claimed accuracy of ±1%. Nevertheless, I’ve not noticed any energy drift, and the pedals appear constant of their measurements. Proceed studying for more information, or purchase them right here.
Magene P715 scoring:Accuracy 5/5 | Reliability 5/5 | Ease of Set up 5/5 | Battery Life 3/5 | Worth 4/5 | WEIGHTED OVERALL SCORE 4.6/5More about this energy meter scoring.
Magene P715 Abstract
Predominant Options
Reasonably priced
Comparatively correct and constant
Superior options (L/R steadiness, pedal smoothness, and many others.)
Automated zero-offset
Exhausting to clip into with Welgo cleats
An outdated “exterior pod” design
Typically they get caught within the improper place for clipping in
No pedal cleats within the field
2-year guarantee
Technical Specification
Claimed accuracy: ±1%
Measured accuracy: -2.5% (in comparison with Wahoo KICKR v5)
Claimed weight: 314g (LOOK KEO), 318g (Shimano SPD-SL)
Measured weight: 312g (LOOK KEO)
Cleat system: LOOK KEO or Shimano SPD-SL
Claimed battery life: 120h
Battery sort: Rechargeable
Q issue size: 55 mm
Magene P715 Options and Advantages
I wrote in regards to the Magene P705 pedal energy meters in 2024. The ultimate model was launched in 2025 below the P715 identify. Its specs differ from the P705’s, however not by a lot.
One of many essential promoting factors of the P715 is its specs, that are the identical (if not higher) as these of the Favero Assioma DUO, however at a good lower cost. Moreover, they’re appropriate with Shimano SPD-SL and LOOK KEO cleat requirements. In 2025, Favero launched the Favero Assioma RS pedals, appropriate with the Shimano SPD-SL commonplace and barely dearer than the UNO/DUO.
I choose pedal-based energy meters for his or her ease of set up. I don’t assume it is smart to purchase crank-based ones anymore, except you’re on a very tight funds. However that’s precisely what Magene tries to alter right here. Nevertheless, they nonetheless use the outdated exterior pod we all know from Favero Assioma UNO/DUO. This one is a little more susceptible to mechanical injury than the one constructed immediately in spindles (discovered on Assioma RS and RL collection or Garmin Rally).
Naturally, P715 pedals supply many of the superior options, together with metrics like pedal smoothness and L/R steadiness. They’ve auto-zero and energetic temperature compensation. The next desk exhibits some in style pedal energy meters and their options.
FeatureFavero Assioma UNO/DUOFavero Assioma RSGarmin Rally x00 (1st gen)Garmin Rally x10 (2nd gen)LOOK Keo Blade PowerMagene P715
Accuracy±1%±1%±1%±1%±1%±1%
Weight w/o cleats299g/pair249g/pair320-444g/pair(relying on the choice)312-444g/pair(relying on the choice)260g/pair314g/pair
Cleat typeLOOK KeoShimano SPD-SLLOOK KeoShimano SPD SLShimano SPDLOOK KeoShimano SPD SLShimano SPDLOOK KeoLOOK KeoShimano SPD-SL
Claimed battery life50 hours60 hours120 hours90 hours60 hours120 hours
Rechargeable batteryYesYesNo YesYesYes
Spindle length54 mm54 mm53 mm55 mm with 2mm washer53 mm55 mm with 2mm washer53 mm55 mm
Auto zeroYesYesYesYesYesYes
Single-sided and dual-sided optionYes (UNO and DUO)Sure (RS-1 and RS-2)Sure (100 and 200)Sure (110 and 210)YesYes
L/R Steadiness, energy phaseDUO onlyRS-2 solely‘200’ collection solely‘210’ collection onlyDual-sided onlyDual-sided solely
Pedal middle offsetn/an/a‘200’ collection solely‘210’ collection onlyYesn/a
ConnectivityANT+, Bluetooth SmartANT+, Bluetooth SmartANT+, Bluetooth SmartANT+, Bluetooth SmartANT+, Bluetooth SmartANT+, Bluetooth Good
Extra infoFavero Assioma Reviewn/an/an/an/aMagene P715 Evaluate
Purchase single-sidedCheck PriceCheck PriceCheck PriceCheck Worth (tredz.co.uk)Test PriceCheck PriceCheck Worth (amazon.com)n/a
Purchase dual-sidedCheck PriceCheck PriceCheck PriceCheck Worth (tredz.co.uk)Test PriceCheck Worth (amazon.com)Test Worth
This desk compares the principle options of the Favero Assioma, Garmin Rally, LOOK, and Magene pedal energy meters.
Accuracy Assessments
I carried out a number of accuracy checks indoors utilizing the Magene P715 pedals and in contrast them to the Wahoo KICKR. Earlier than testing, I carried out an auto-zero offset (though it’s not obligatory, as a result of each units have auto-zero) and up to date them to the newest firmware. I then in contrast the match recordsdata utilizing this FIT File Analyzer device.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Though the KICKR v5 achieved excessive accuracy in my checks and may subsequently be thought-about an correct baseline, a 3rd energy meter could be wanted to substantiate these outcomes.
Indoor Assessments
For my indoor testing, I recorded Magene P715 knowledge on my Garmin Edge 840 and Edge 1040 Photo voltaic, and Wahoo KICKR 5 knowledge by way of Zwift and TrainerRoad.
Indoor Check #1 (Intervals)
The next chart is predicated on testing intervals in TrainerRoad’s ERG mode. Not one of the energy sources skilled dropouts, however P715 constantly reported decrease energy by a median of -2.8%. It reported decrease most energy by -6.2% in comparison with KICKR v5.
Cadence outcomes had been a bit extra correct, however Magene pedals overreported it by 1.7% in comparison with KICKR.
The crucial energy chart exhibits the typical energy for various durations. Once more, the facility measured by Magene P715 is constantly under the Wahoo KICKR.
Indoor Check #2 (Freeride)
The next exercise is a free trip on Loop de Loop in Zwift. Once more, not one of the energy sources skilled dropouts or spikes. Magene P715 reported decrease common energy by -2.1% in comparison with KICKR v5.
The cadence was once more overreported by Magene P715 by 1.3%, proving consistency with the primary check.
And the crucial energy chart confirms the outcomes of the typical energy from Magene P715 and exhibits that the facility was underestimated throughout all intervals.
Indoor Check #3 (Race)
Right here, I’ve a Zwift race that exhibits comparable outcomes to the earlier two checks. Common and most energy had been underreported by Magene P715 by -2.5% and -4.8%, respectively.
Cadence was nearly on level apart from the 2 small dropouts by P715 at first of the race. Additionally, KICKR spiked at across the 20-minute mark.
And lastly, the info once more constantly confirmed underreported energy readings throughout a number of time intervals.
Outside Assessments
Initially, I wished to additionally examine P715 in opposition to the Elilee EK01 energy meter. Nevertheless, it proved to be unreliable (Elilee even took it down from their web site). As soon as I’ve a dependable spider energy meter, I’ll contemplate retesting the P715 exterior.
Ecosystem and App Expertise
The Magene P715 comes with the Magene Utility App. It’s important for firmware updates, guide calibration, and toggling superior options. It additionally exhibits your energy, energy part, and different cool metrics.
Zero-Offset: The “Automated Zero-Offset” is straightforward to toggle inside the app settings. As soon as enabled, the pedals deal with calibration successfully behind the scenes, which is a “set it and neglect it” luxurious.
Compatibility: Whereas I primarily used Garmin Edge models, I additionally examined the P715 with Wahoo and Hammerhead head models. The ANT+ and Bluetooth Good connections had been steady throughout all platforms, with the superior metrics (like L/R steadiness) showing appropriately on all appropriate units.
Q-Issue
Do not forget that P715 pedals have a 55mm Q-factor, which is 2mm greater than Favero Assioma RK/RS or Garmin Rally. I actually don’t discover the distinction, however in case you are tremendous delicate to tiny modifications, that is one thing to bear in mind. The 11mm stack top of the KEO model (and 13mm for the Shimano model) is consistent with different options.
Different Observations
Concerning construct high quality and sturdiness, P715 pedals really feel well-made. I did a few gravel rides and a few wet-weather rides, they usually had been rock stable, so it appears the IPX7 score works as supposed. I’ve not skilled any battery charging points. The charging adaptors use the identical precept because the Favero Assioma UNO/DUO pedals: they’ve a magnet that “magically” attaches to the pedal.
Magene P715 Options
The primary Favero Assioma pedal energy meter options are:
Favero Assioma UNO/DUO, RS-1, and RS-2. They’re thought-about the business commonplace. You may learn my Assioma DUO assessment for more information.
Garmin Rally 1st and 2nd era pedal energy meters can be found in 3 choices: XC (MTB), RS (Shimano SPD-SL), and RK (LOOK Keo). They’re all out there in single-sided or dual-sided variations and supply the identical options, however they’re much dearer. Learn this comparability of Garmin Rally and Favero Assioma for extra particulars.
Wahoo POWRLINK Zero are the one energy meter pedals out there for the Wahoo Speedplay cleat system. They’re additionally out there in dual-sided or single-sided variations, however are dearer.
Every other crank arm, spider, or different varieties of energy meters.
My Verdict
The Magene P715 stands out as a extremely aggressive entry within the pedal energy meter market, providing superior metrics and dual-cleat compatibility (LOOK KEO and Shimano SPD-SL) at a aggressive $499 worth level. Whereas the set up is seamless and the consistency is excessive, there are some mechanical trade-offs, equivalent to an occasional slight imbalance that may make clipping in harder than with premium opponents.
Concerning efficiency, the P715 demonstrated constant conduct. Nevertheless, they constantly underreported energy by a median of –2.5% in comparison with the Wahoo KICKR v5.
Whereas I contemplate the KICKR a dependable baseline, a 3rd energy supply could be wanted to definitively confirm whether or not the Magene pedals or the KICKR good coach supplies the extra correct studying.
In the end, if you happen to prioritize affordability and constant knowledge monitoring, the P715 is a worthy contender and a extra inexpensive different to some Western energy pedals.
The product for this assessment was kindly supplied by the producer. This didn’t affect my general verdict or my opinion in regards to the product. You may study extra about how I strategy critiques right here.
Browse Extra Energy Meters-Associated Content material
