The introduction of Components 1’s 2026 energetic‑aerodynamic rules has already sparked a wave of inventive engineering options, and two groups—Audi and Alpine—have emerged with significantly unconventional rear‑wing mechanisms.
Their contrasting interpretations of the brand new guidelines display how a lot freedom groups now have in designing DRS‑type methods that function far past the normal single‑flap idea.
Audi’s Central‑Pivot, Single‑Linkage Structure
Audi’s rear wing stands out instantly because of its uncommon rotation system. As a substitute of inserting the pivot level close to the higher or decrease fringe of the wing helps, the workforce has positioned it straight in the course of the endplate construction. This central placement causes the flaps to rotate in a noticeably totally different sample in comparison with rival designs, producing a particular aerodynamic impact when the wing enters its low‑drag mode.
Due to this geometry, the flaps open at an angle relatively than in a uniform, horizontal movement. This angled rotation redirects the airflow in a special route, altering how the air detaches from the wing and influencing the behaviour of the movement towards the beam wing and diffuser.
Audi has additionally chosen a mechanical structure that differs from the extra frequent twin‑actuator methods utilized by different groups. As a substitute of two attachment factors controlling each flaps, Audi makes use of a single linkage that drives solely the higher flap.
The decrease flap then follows passively, transferring as a consequence of the higher flap’s rotation. This creates a extra fluid, much less constrained opening movement that offers the wing a singular aerodynamic signature.
The result’s a rear wing that seems to drive the airflow downward extra aggressively when opened, as a result of steep angle the flaps undertake of their low‑drag configuration. This behaviour may affect each drag discount and rear‑finish stability in ways in which differ considerably from standard DRS methods.
Spot the distinction – the energetic aero version! 👀#F1 #F1Testing pic.twitter.com/ltP3fV9WOa
— Components 1 (@F1) February 13, 2026
Alpine’s Reverse‑Performing Flap Mechanism
Whereas Audi has pursued a central‑pivot, single‑linkage idea, Alpine has taken a totally totally different method. Their rear wing operates by collapsing the trailing edge relatively than rotating the vanguard. In follow, this implies the rear portion of the flap folds downward whereas the entrance part stays mounted in place.
This reverse‑appearing mechanism successfully extends the mainplane when the wing opens, altering how the wing sheds load and lowering drag in a way that contrasts sharply with Audi’s angled‑flap design. The result’s a low‑drag mode that alters the wing’s profile from the again relatively than rotating all the flap meeting.
A New Period of Energetic Aerodynamics
Each Audi and Alpine are taking full benefit of the expanded freedoms launched for 2026. The brand new guidelines permit groups to include moveable parts not solely on the rear wing but in addition on the entrance wing, and these gadgets may be activated on each straight relatively than solely in designated DRS zones.
This shift transforms energetic aero from a easy overtaking assist right into a full‑lap aerodynamic system that should steadiness drag discount, power deployment and cornering efficiency.
Audi’s angled, centrally pivoted flaps and Alpine’s reverse‑collapsing trailing edge symbolize two radically totally different philosophies in rear‑wing design.
Each groups are exploring the boundaries of what energetic aerodynamics can obtain below the brand new rules, and their improvements counsel that the 2026 season might ship probably the most technically various grids in fashionable Components 1.
F1Sakhir







