The morning earlier than the 2024 World Athletics Cross Nation Championships in Serbia, Elizabeth Egan ran a exercise alongside the bike path that runs alongside the Danube River in Belgrade’s Park of Friendship. She seen one thing attention-grabbing. Whereas half of the course — together with the beginning/end space, relay change zone, and video board — had been blocked off by tall chain-link safety fences, the opposite half was protected by low metallic fences that allowed a view of the motion.
This, Egan thought, was an excellent factor. It will give organizers the chance to capitalize on the race-day foot visitors transferring by means of the park on an unseasonably heat Saturday afternoon in late March — even when these passersby didn’t get to see the entire motion.
That afternoon, Egan returned to take a look at the course in additional element. She strolled across the perimeter of the venue, taking discover of the breaks within the tall safety fence. Workforce Entrance. Workers Entrance. VIP Entrance. And…that was it. No spectator entrance. Anybody with out a credential, Egan realized, must watch from the realm she had seen throughout her exercise that morning.
“It was then like, oh, that is all we’re getting,” Egan mentioned. “Can’t see the massive display screen, can’t see the end, can’t see the beginning.”
Article continues beneath participant.
Lots of the spectators in Belgrade had been there to cheer on a pal or member of the family, however Egan, who had traveled from Eire for the race, is just an enormous fan of World XC — “I sort of like a distinct segment occasion,” she mentioned. The issue, Egan mentioned, is that no one concerned with organizing the meet — not World Athletics, not the native organizing committee — appeared to have thought concerning the spectators in any respect. Earlier than the race, Egan visited the meet web site in the hunt for fundamental data, resembling whether or not she wanted a ticket for the occasion. She couldn’t discover the reply.
“I don’t need a crimson carpet rolled out for me, however some form of recognition that spectators are welcome can be good,” Egan mentioned. “There wasn’t even any signage [on the course] to say ‘spectators this fashion’ or something. You’d have greater than that at an area open meet.”
Milica Živić, a Serbian former 400m runner who lives in Belgrade and attended the meet, mentioned the occasion was promoted far lower than the 2022 World Indoors and 2017 European Indoors, additionally held in Belgrade.
“I don’t assume the promotion was finished properly,” Živić mentioned.
The followers who did present up on race day had been in a position to entry round half of the course, together with up-close views of the main obstacles such because the hay bales and dust pit (although a lot of the foot visitors alongside the bike path didn’t find yourself staying for the meet). However most of the fundamental spectator facilities had been lacking. There have been no merchandise tents, and no public bogs on the course. As an alternative, spectators needed to wander away and use the amenities at a close-by lodge.
There have been additionally no concession stands — an issue when temperatures climbed above 80 levels on a course with no shade. Happily, there have been water stations for the athletes all through the course, and volunteers had been in a position to give a few of these bottles to spectators in want. Others got here up with a extra inventive resolution.
“I bought a drink from the tanker that was getting used to refill the mud bathtub,” mentioned one other spectator, Emily Evans. “There have been some little faucets on the again.”
Whereas crowds in Belgrade weren’t giant — there can’t have been greater than 500 followers on the course on Saturday — one of many beauties of cross nation is {that a} small crowd can really feel larger as a result of followers are sometimes in a position to run across the course and watch the race from a number of spots. However in Belgrade, it was not attainable for spectators to cross the course. A number of the spots which might be historically the loudest, resembling the house straight and end line, had been largely barren, restricted to these with credentials. A far cry from the raucous grandstand that roared Uganda’s Jacob Kiplimo residence to gold within the U20 race seven years in the past in Kampala.
“Clearly we might have hoped to have followers down the ending straight,” mentioned Kevin Sanchez, the highest American finisher within the U20 race, whose mother and father and brother flew to Serbia to look at him compete.
5 years in the past, Christine Murphy and Bruce Davies traveled from Sarnia, Ontario, to World XC in Aarhus to look at their son Andrew Davies run within the U20 race for Canada. In that race, they had been in a position to meet Andrew within the end space. After he cooled down, they watched the senior races collectively as a household. In Belgrade, the place Andrew was competing within the senior race, they had been solely in a position to meet him briefly when he snuck out of the accredited space simply earlier than the Canadian crew was set to depart.
“The most important factor I missed was the tip,” Murphy mentioned. “In Aarhus, we went over and we chatted with the Canadian junior boys after they completed, bought some photos, talked to the coach. That milling about on the finish with mother and father and households, which is such an enormous a part of it, was gone.”
The house straight in Belgrade was largely empty and restricted to VIPs
LetsRun.com requested World Athletics why spectators had been barred from the end space in Belgrade. World Athletics referred inquiries to the native organizing committee, which didn’t reply to LetsRun.com.
In Belgrade’s protection, town solely had six months to plan the championships after taking up when World Athletics pulled the meet from the Croatian cities of Medulin and Pula. By all accounts, the athletes had been handled properly and the course, whereas fundamental, nonetheless featured parts that challenged runners.
And regardless of the spectator pitfalls, Egan, Evans, Murphy, and Davies all mentioned they loved their expertise at 2024 World XC. However Davies, who had additionally been to Bathurst final 12 months to look at his son compete, mentioned that whereas Belgrade had been a enjoyable afternoon on the races, it may have been a lot extra — a standard sentiment amongst these interviewed for this story.
“This was a smaller crowd than our regional highschool meet,” Murphy mentioned. “It didn’t have that championship vibe and vitality that had been current in Aarhus and I believe in Bathurst.”
“The advantage of cross nation usually is that you simply get very near the motion and you may run round and go to varied spots on the course and see the entire race,” Evans mentioned. “That’s what we missed right here in Belgrade, and that’s one of many issues that makes cross nation so good. You could have spectators concerned to make athletics satisfying, and we misplaced it on that event. Having solely the media and VIPs have entry to view the beginning and end is a step backwards.”
***
Waiting for Tallahassee 2026
The excellent news, because the countdown begins to the following World Cross Nation Championships, which will probably be hosted in Tallahassee, Florida, in 2026, is that the spectator issues of Belgrade ought to be a comparatively simple repair. The truth is, Tallahassee already has a course mapped out with fan expertise zones.
Promotion ought to be higher as properly. Tallahassee has identified it will likely be internet hosting since July 2022, and contemplating the variety of followers who traveled to Orlando in February for this 12 months’s US Olympic Marathon Trials, it shouldn’t be a tough promote to persuade just a few thousand followers to take a midwinter journey to sunny Florida for the primary World XC on US soil since 1992.
Kiplimo has persistently run World XC for Uganda (Picture by Srdjan Stevanovic/Getty Photographs for World Athletics)
No, the problems with World Cross Nation are extra structural. The basic one is that this: too most of the high athletes and federations view World XC as non-obligatory. There are numerous causes for this, from the timing of the meet to East Africa’s domination to the primacy of the Olympics and its qualification system. However the result’s that most of the high distance runners routinely skip World XC in a method they by no means would on the monitor.
This isn’t a brand new situation, nor does it imply that World XC as presently constructed is totally damaged. The headline of this piece, “The way to Make the World Cross Nation Championships Matter,” is barely deceptive in that it suggests current editions didn’t matter in any respect. That’s not the case.
World XC crowns a world champion, and plenty of nice runners present as much as battle for that honor. Bathurst 2023 was stacked with top-end expertise — the lads’s race featured the world 10,000 champ Joshua Cheptegei in opposition to the World Half champ Jacob Kiplimo in opposition to the Olympic 10,000 champ Selemon Barega whereas the ladies’s race featured world 10,000/half marathon report holder Letesenbet Gidey and rising star Beatrice Chebet. However not each version is as talent-rich, and for too many nations — the US included — World XC doesn’t matter almost as a lot because it ought to.
As a spectacle, World XC is a superb occasion. The ambiance in Kampala in 2017 was electrical. The course in Aarhus in 2019 was one of many hardest — and finest — ever devised for a cross nation race and resulted in a unbelievable day of racing. Bathurst 2023 was a hit. However this 12 months’s occasion in Serbia was a step again. And World XC can’t afford any extra of these if the occasion is to thrive long-term.
World Athletics president Seb Coe is a cross nation fan and has lengthy pressured that there’s a place for the occasion in trendy distance coaching. He wish to see World XC proceed, and it ought to, so long as cities stay desirous about bidding for it.
“It’s nonetheless an necessary property and has a historic place in our athletics panorama,” Coe mentioned in Belgrade.
However Coe additionally admitted that on the subject of World XC, “We’ve bought work to do.”
“I wish to see extra of our European nations supporting and travelling to those championships,” Coe mentioned.
European participation is down in current editions. The final 5 World XCs have featured a median of 16.0 European males and 15.4 European ladies within the senior races, in comparison with 32.6 and 28.8 within the 5 editions from 2008-13. These numbers are considerably skewed given 4 of the 5 World XCs from 2008-13 had been held in Europe in comparison with simply two of 5 from 2015-24. However it’s worrying that the numbers from the 2024 championships on European soil — 17 European males and 15 European ladies — had been considerably decrease than the participation numbers from 2006 (23 males, 26 ladies) and 2007 (29 males, 23 ladies), occasions that had been held in Japan and Kenya, respectively.
Europeans nonetheless like cross nation. Ninety males and 58 ladies ran within the senior races at the newest European Cross Nation Championships in Brussels in December. However most European federations — Nice Britain and Spain excepted — have determined it’s not price sending groups to a meet the place their athletes have little probability of ending on the rostrum.
Since 2005, just one European crew — the Portuguese ladies in 2006 — has earned a medal within the senior race at World XC with the Kenyan-born Lornah Kiplagat of the Netherlands the one European particular person to medal in that span. During the last 5 editions, 92% of the top-10 finishers within the males’s and ladies’s senior races have come from simply three nations: Kenya, Ethiopia, and Uganda.
However East African domination at World XC is nothing new. East African runners are additionally actually good at working 10,000 meters on the monitor; it stands to motive they’d be good on a ten,000-meter cross nation course. So why is East Africa a lot extra dominant in cross nation than on the monitor?
It’s fairly easy. The non-African runners profitable medals on the monitor hardly ever run at World XC. Listed below are the final 10 non-African athletes to medal at Worlds or the Olympics within the 5,000 or 10,000 meters, together with what number of instances they ran World XC as professionals:
Athlete
Nation
World XC appearances (senior race)
Galen Rupp
USA
By no means
Emily Infeld
USA
2013
Mo Farah
Nice Britain
2003, 2005-07, 2010(0 after his first monitor medal)
Konstanze Klosterhalfen
Germany
By no means
Paul Chelimo
USA
By no means
Moh Ahmed
Canada
2013
Kalkidan Gezahegne
Bahrain
By no means
Mo Katir
Spain
By no means
Sifan Hassan
Netherlands
By no means
Jakob Ingebrigtsen
Norway
By no means
So of these 10 athletes — a listing that features a number of the largest names within the sport over the past decade — simply three ever ran the senior race at World XC. And two of these include caveats since Farah by no means ran it as soon as his profession took off on the monitor in 2011, whereas Ahmed’s solely look got here in 2013 whereas he was nonetheless in school at Wisconsin.
The highest African runners have a a lot larger participation fee. Selemon Barega ran the following World XC after profitable the Olympic 10,000 in 2021. Joshua Cheptegei has gained the final three World 10,000 titles and has run the final 4 World XCs. Letesenbet Gidey ran World XC in 2023 after profitable Worlds on the monitor the earlier 12 months. Hellen Obiri ran World XC in 2019 after profitable Worlds on the monitor in 2017.
So what fixes are so as? We will consider two massive ones that may enhance World XC instantly, plus yet one more that World Athletics is already on its solution to fixing.
1) Make World XC the way in which to qualify for the ten,000 at Worlds and the Olympics
Let’s name this “the Robert Johnson rule” since my boss and editor is the one who got here up with it on final week’s LetsRun.com Observe Discuss Podcast.
American report holder Monson has run cross nation as a professional, simply not World XC
The previous two years have proven that so long as the Olympics and monitor World Championships stay an important occasions within the sport, athletes are going to blow off World XC with the intention to prioritize these meets. You assume Grant Fisher, Joe Klecker, and Alicia Monson don’t like cross nation? In fact they do. However the Olympics and Worlds are extra necessary to them. As an alternative of World XC, they’d reasonably chase an auto normal or keep away from breaking apart coaching by touring midway around the globe for a race. And you may’t completely blame them: the inducement construction of the game prioritizes the monitor.
So how do you get them to point out as much as World XC? Change the incentives.
There are 27 spots on the startline for the World and Olympic 10,000-meter finals. Make it so that the majority of these spots are earned by means of the World Cross Nation Championships.
Right here’s how it might work: the highest 24 finishers at World XC (after limiting it to 3 athletes per nation) unlock spots within the subsequent international monitor championship for his or her nation. From there, it’s as much as every nation to find out allocate these spots. This fixes three issues without delay:
I) The very best athletes will run World XC
If you happen to’re a high 10,000-meter runner, are you going to sit down out World XC and hope that your nation earns its spots? Possibly in the event you’re Kenyan, Ethiopian, or Ugandan. However most different athletes can be confronted with a alternative: run World XC or danger lacking out on the ten,000 at Worlds or the Olympics.
II) Normal-chasing within the 10,000 can be eradicated
Championship racing is extra thrilling than time trialing. As an alternative of getting high athletes run a time trial 10,000 to qualify for Worlds or the Olympics, they’d be qualifying through World XC — a world championship the place locations matter and there’s precise status for profitable. That’s a win for the game.
III) Nationwide championships would matter extra
The very best factor a couple of US championship is that it’s cut-and-dried — the highest three finishers throughout the road make the crew, fourth place goes residence devastated. No less than, that’s how it’s purported to work.
However that’s not all the time the way it works in follow. Typically, there are solely 4 or 5 athletes who’ve the requisite qualifying normal or world rating to make the crew. So if 2nd or third doesn’t have the usual, out of the blue we’re listening to 4th or fifth. Or we’re making an attempt to determine if 2nd or third place has sufficient world rating factors to displace…and your head is spinning. Championships ought to be easy, not sophisticated.
We’ve mentioned it earlier than and we’ll say it once more: if a rustic goes to have three athletes within the Olympic last regardless, they need to have the ability to maintain a trials and ship anybody from the highest three — not simply the athletes with the usual.
***
However wait, you say. How are you going to award spots in a monitor 10,000 to athletes primarily based on cross nation outcomes? They’re completely different occasions.
Our reply: so what?
Beneath the present qualifying system, eight of the 27 spots within the Olympic 10,000 area are decided by world cross nation rating — a system that may be gamed by amassing factors at uncompetitive meets. Awarding spots primarily based on end at World XC makes extra sense than that.
Plus have a look at the marathon. Proper now, the overwhelming majority of athletes get their Olympic marathon qualifiers in races like Valencia or Seville that function flat programs, good climate, and nice pacemaking. The Valencia and Seville Marathons are nothing just like the Olympic marathon, but that’s the way you qualify for the Olympics. Utilizing cross nation outcomes to qualify for a monitor 10,000 isn’t a lot completely different.
You don’t must have 100% of the qualifiers come from World XC — it is perhaps good to go away just a few spots open in case a megastar is damage and might’t run World XC. Possibly it’s not the highest 24 from World XC however the high 20 or high 22. And since World XC is presently solely in even years, you’d have to determine a solution to synthesize that with the Worlds/Olympic schedule — maybe by holding World XC three out of each 4 years to reflect the worldwide monitor championships. However the fundamental level stands: in the event you hyperlink World XC with Olympic qualification, both the celebrities will flip up at World XC or they are going to abandon the monitor 10,000 completely.
2) Don’t put World XC and World Indoors in the identical 12 months
(Picture by © Adam Nurkiewicz for World Athletics)
Beginning in 2011, World Athletics switched World XC from an annual occasion to biennial. The timing made sense. In even-numbered years, distance runners may both drop down and run World Indoors or step up and run the World Half. In odd-numbered years, they ran World XC.
Now the calendar is completely completely different. The World Half is now the World Highway Operating Championships and has moved to the autumn in order that runners can do it simply after the monitor season wraps up. And each World XC and World Indoors are being run in even years with nothing in odd years.
The overlap isn’t large between athletes working World Indoors and World XC, however there’s an overlap. Furthermore, it simply doesn’t make sense for World Athletics to have two of its championships in shut proximity in even years and nothing in any respect in the course of the corresponding dates in odd years.
World Athletics has been bringing the date of World XC ahead in order that athletes gearing up for Euro XC can run each meets extra simply — the following World XC will probably be on January 10, 2026, the earliest in historical past. If a January date will increase participation, nice. However it ought to be January of odd-numbered years.
The exception right here is that if World Athletics can someway persuade the IOC to place cross nation within the Winter Olympics, one thing we’re strongly in favor of however seems unlikely to occur.
3) Make the course difficult and distinctive
Mud is a should at World XC (Picture by © Adam Nurkiewicz for World Athletics)
The Belgrade course paled compared to the 2 earlier editions in Aarhus and Bathurst. A part of that’s as a result of Belgrade needed to step in on the final minute and didn’t have the identical period of time to design a course. However half is as a result of venue. The Park of Friendship is identical venue that hosted Euro XC in 2013, and it simply isn’t an excellent web site for cross nation. It’s flat and nondescript, barely distinguishable from tons of of different parks throughout Europe. Even a talented course architect would have hassle turning it into an incredible cross nation course.
That mentioned, the racing was nonetheless fairly good in Belgrade. The hay bales introduced a singular problem, and the truth that athletes selected a mixture of hurdling and weaving means they had been spaced completely — there was no clear most suitable choice for going by means of them. And the mud pit made the race seem like “actual” cross nation, even on an 80-degree day. Each of these improvements ought to stay for future editions.
However what set Aarhus and Bathurst other than Belgrade — along with the hills — was a way of place. Aarhus, with its monster climb up the roof of a museum, felt in contrast to every other course on the earth. Ditto Bathurst, whose course ran by means of a winery and was situated in the course of an auto racing monitor.
The purpose right here is that cross nation isn’t the identical as monitor. Runners ought to face challenges they don’t face on the monitor, and the venues ought to really feel distinctive. This isn’t a “repair” in the identical method as the primary two factors — current native organizing committees in Aarhus and Bathurst have already finished an excellent job of this. However it’s one thing to recollect transferring ahead.
