Thursday’s, on this nook of the Universo Pugilistico, are all about my sack– my bulging, bulbous, aching sack– and the gooey, salty reality contained inside. So…sit again, shut your eyes, pull again your hair, and prepare for this week’s cash shot of knowledge. This week we now have feedback/questions concerning Keyshawn Davis’ flub, Canelo-Crawford on Netflix, revisiting Lomachenko’s legacy.
Keyshawn’s Non-Homecoming Get together
Paul,
As a Norfolk native, I used to be excited for final week’s battle. 757 is a proud space and we’ve generated some nice athletic and musical expertise over time. Throw within the navy presence and it truly is a peculiar place. There’s no query, Keyshawn Davis is an elite stage expertise.
That stated, what occurred final week was a meltdown of epic proportions for Davis. I received’t go into element, everyone knows it on the floor. My primary query is the place the hell was High Rank throughout all of this? Shouldn’t there be a contingency plan if Davis misses weight and agreements can’t be met? Being a small market battle at Scope, the followers had been left carrying the bag. Even when David discovered a D+ substitute fighter recent off the sofa, Norfolk would have liked it. Makes me marvel if Davis even needed to battle.
What’s your tackle happening with an occasion if fighters miss weight? Kudos to Santos for not budging. It could have simply been good to nonetheless have some kind of battle for the hometown man; even when what he did was past unprofessional. What’s your tackle substitute fighters which might be gimme fights?
– Greg
Hey Greg.
What Keyshawn did was in all probability the worst factor a rising star might’ve finished as he builds and fortifies a base. IMO, coming in thus far over the restrict was a cynical calculation on his half. He figured on tossing some cash De Los Santos’ method, coming in recent, and wiping the mat together with his opponent for a spotlight reel second in entrance of his adoring hometown followers. I believe this was intentional. It backfired fully when De Los Santos stood agency on the contracted weight. Good for him and good on the promotion for reportedly nonetheless paying him his full purse.
Netflix and Chill?
Hello Paul.
Canelo vs. Crawford on Netflix is all win for boxing followers. We received’t must pay a PPV payment and extra folks will be capable of see the battle. I do know your emotions on Turki and Saudi Arabia and I agree together with your principled stance, however there’s no unfavorable to any of this Canelo-Bud/Netflix association. I could or could not have paid the PPV worth for the battle, however I’m joyful to have the ability to see the battle as a part of my Netflix subscription and never must firestick it.
– Sammy
Hey Sammy.
I’ll agree with you, a minimum of in regards to the plus-plus of getting the battle on Netflix. I do have an issue, although, with Turki Alalshikh’s “We do not want massive fights on the undercard” proclamation the opposite day, flat-out telling the world that the undercard can be shit. If there are ever occasions the place good undercards are vital, it’s ones like this one, on an enormous mainstream platform the place plenty of folks will be uncovered to high quality expertise and good fights. Jake Paul-Mike Tyson did that. Canelo-Crawford, apparently, won’t.
However I received’t shit on the Netflix side. That’s undoubtedly a superb transfer for the followers (and, I could also be mistaken, however I don’t assume the buffering points that plagued Paul-Tyson can be as dangerous for Canelo-Crawford– largely as a result of I don’t assume as many individuals can be watching this battle reside).
Nonetheless, the darkish clouds throughout this event– Turki, the Saudis, TKO Group, Dana White, and so forth.– make the one constructive really feel like a pearl in a lake of uncooked sewage. Plus, there’s additionally the fact that Canelo-Crawford was a battle that no one actually needed, no one was asking for, and one which represents the truth that higher, extra logical fights for the 2 (Benavidez, Boots) received’t be taking place.
Revisiting Lomachenko’s Legacy
What’s up Paul? Glorious piece on Lomachenko.
I simply need to chime in on my perspective. Loma’s legacy is bittersweet. He deserves his flowers and the credit score that he’s due. Nonetheless, it might be irresponsible if his legacy isn’t put into correct context.
He was an awesome fighter! How nice was he? He wasn’t as nice as the trendy boxing media made him out to be. There’s ranges to greatness and Lomas stage of greatness was the bottom tier attainable.
Obtained to offer him credit score for his extraordinary profession as an beginner and his willingness to leap proper into the ring with prime fighters early on in his skilled profession. He didn’t take half a dozen gentle touches earlier than he began competing. He jumped proper into the thick of it and started combating extremely ranked opponents.
When High Rank moved to ESPN they launched a large boxing agenda with Lomachenko headlined as their primary attraction. He failed miserably, in the event that they’d put Terence Crawford in the identical place they put Lomachenko ESPN in all probability would nonetheless be within the enterprise of broadcasting boxing occasions.
He by no means actually regarded dominant at 135. He was a prime light-weight, however the sparks that had been promised had been all the time missing. He did not ship on the field workplace and was removed from the headline attraction that they made him out to be.
His greatest victory on file at 135 was his battle in opposition to Jorge Linares, he was getting beat badly and scored that late KO. Outdoors of that he misplaced to Teo Lopez and Devin Haney. The remainder of his fights had been fights that he ought to’ve received.
He spent most of his profession at 135. I can title quite a few fighters who had a greater run at 135 than Lomachenko. I received’t do a listing, however everyone knows who they’re. The place do you rank Loma amongst the best lightweights of all time? To me he’s not even prime 10, perhaps prime 25.
– Na’-il Rahman
Hey Na’-il.
It’s arduous to disagree with something you simply stated. Like with plenty of these Japanese European fighters, the promise, the hype, and the fawning media protection didn’t match the black-and-white actuality. I believe the tales of Lomachenko and Gennadiy Golovkin are just about the identical. On the finish of the day, neither lived as much as the large push they bought or the narratives that pushed them into ATG standing. Lomachenko’s physique of labor was larger than Golovkin’s, nevertheless it positively didn’t reside as much as what was pushed down our throats, always, for years.
However, additionally like Golovkin, Lomachenko was an awesome fighter in his personal time and beneath the circumstances by which he competed. He’s not all-time High 10. I don’t do these rankings both, however I’d say High 25 is perhaps proper. However, then once more, light-weight has a really deep and wealthy historical past, so who is aware of.
My go-to assertion concerning fighter legacies and judging them in opposition to historical past is always– Cease. Simply benefit from the fighters for what they’re, once they’re competing.
Obtained a query (or hate mail) for Magno’s Bulging Mail Sack? One of the best of one of the best will get included within the weekly mailbag phase proper right here at FightHype. Ship your stuff right here: paulmagno@theboxingtribune.com.
