Generally, folks say absurd issues, and it’s a part of our job to allow you to, the reader, find out about it.
In MMA, that’s simply known as “at the moment.” So to your Friday lunacy, we’re obliged to inform you Matt Hamill, the 47-year-old former UFC fighter greatest recognized for being the one loss on heavyweight champion Jon Jones’ document, has provided to finish his 6-year retirement to rematch Jones for the belt.
“Let’s reduce this chase… @danawhite – I do know you’re determined to get @jonnybones an undefeated document. I see the way you need to revenue from that! Can also be why you bail him out of all the opposite issues…” Hamill posted on Instagram. “How a couple of rematch?! I’ll be comfortable to battle him for a heavyweight title. If I beat him, I desire a UFC belt. Let me know if Stipe Miocic backs out. I’ll take quick discover, simply bear in mind he already misplaced to me!”
All of it stems from Tuesday’s unanimous determination from the Affiliation of Boxing Commissions and Combative Sports activities committee to carry the longstanding ban on 12-6 elbows, so named for his or her straight up and down movement, just like the palms on a clock at 12 and 6.
On Dec. 5, 2009, on the UFC’s Season 10 finale of “The Final Fighter” in Las Vegas, Jones was disqualified in opposition to Hamill for the unlawful elbows. Within the first spherical of the battle, after Jones had delivered loads of ground-and-pound on Hamill, he landed a pair of 12-6 elbows. After the primary, referee Steve Mazzagatti began to warn Jones. On the second, he stopped the battle instantly and informed Jones he was taking some extent away.
When Hamill couldn’t proceed, the ruling was modified to a disqualification loss, a lot to Jones’ dismay. Almost 15 years later, it stays the one blemish on his document, and people sympathetic to that blemish have campaigned with Jones that the loss must be overturned.
When Jones heard of the rule change, which is able to happen in November, he lobbied UFC CEO Dana White to assist take away the loss from his document. That, after all, could be one thing the Nevada Athletic Fee would take difficulty with. There is no such thing as a query the 12-6 elbows have been unlawful on the time of the battle. If Jones knew the rule, and Jones broke the rule, and it led to a loss, the argument is he shouldn’t have damaged the rule.
Reversing his DQ loss could be akin to a driver getting a rushing ticket for doing 50 in a 35mph pace zone in 2009, however in 2024 the pace restrict there was modified to 50 and the ticketed driver needs a refund and a cleared document. It was the legislation on the time. Good luck with that.
And simply as absurd to most is Hamill’s declare he’d hop proper right into a UFC cage and provides Jones a battle and stroll away as heavyweight champion. Jones nearly destroyed Hamill 15 years in the past on his method up and unquestionably solely received higher after that.
Jones’ 2009 loss, in a simply world, will stay a loss. Break the principles, undergo the implications. However a simply world additionally would possibly ask for Hamill to get one other Jones beatdown only for the suggestion that’s a battle that must be settled.
Two issues will be true on the similar time: Jones demolished Hamill. And Jones deserved to be disqualified underneath the letter of the legislation.
The Blue Nook is MMA Junkie’s weblog house. In the event you come complaining to us that one thing you learn right here shouldn’t be hard-hitting information, that is on you.
You should definitely go to the MMA Junkie Instagram web page and YouTube channel to debate this and extra content material with followers of combined martial arts.
