DALLAS — School soccer commissioners left Tuesday’s School Soccer Playoff assembly with none selections on potential modifications to the format, however stress to decide and public backlash over a possible overhaul or enlargement in 2026 proceed to mount.
CFP government director Wealthy Clark mentioned most of Tuesday’s assembly was a glance again on the outcomes of 2024 and the way the inaugural 12-team CFP carried out, together with a briefing from TV consultants. It was the group’s first assembly because the Jan. 20 nationwide championship recreation. However the public consideration is on the potential modifications for 2025 after which 2026, the latter when the Massive Ten and SEC take extra energy in figuring out what the CFP format seems to be like by means of 2031.
Whether or not it’s seeding modifications in 2025 or enlargement in 2026, the clock is ticking.
“We need to have selections made quickly,” Clark mentioned after the assembly that lasted greater than seven hours. “(2025) is clearly essentially the most urgent.”
Massive Ten commissioner Tony Petitti and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, whose conferences met collectively final week in New Orleans to debate a number of matters together with the CFP, left Tuesday’s assembly with out talking to reporters.
The subject most mentioned for 2025 entails potential seeding modifications. Champions from the Mountain West (Boise State) and Massive 12 (Arizona State) acquired top-four seeds and first-round byes whereas sitting outdoors the highest eight of the CFP choice committee’s rankings. The 2025 CFP would be the final of the preliminary 12-year contract that began in 2014. Any modifications to the 12-team format for 2025 will want unanimous assist from leaders of every convention and Notre Dame.
Massive Ten and SEC leaders have expressed a need to vary that to “straight seeding,” the place the committee’s rankings decide the seeds, whereas nonetheless defending 5 automated qualifying spots. However doing so might trigger these outdoors the Massive Ten and SEC to overlook a first-round bye — and the multimillion payout that comes with it. The CFP’s remaining prime 4 final season featured all Massive Ten or SEC groups.
ACC commissioner Jim Phillips and Massive 12 commissioner Brett Yormark wouldn’t rule out agreeing to seeding modifications on Tuesday, however mentioned they requested the CFP employees present them with extra info earlier than making a choice — info like previous outcomes and different elements.
Is there something that might persuade them it’s value giving up these two byes for non-Massive Ten/SEC groups? Maybe extra assured cash?
“It’s too early to find out that,” Yormark mentioned after the assembly. “We had a extremely good dialogue. They’re going to run some fashions and get again to us subsequent month. Good, heartfelt conversations. Everybody gave their perspective and we’ll vet it out.”
Yormark added that the format for 2025 ought to assist set the desk for 2026, and that they shouldn’t be considered as fully separate entities.
However the potential modifications for 2026 and past are extra dramatic. Massive Ten and SEC officers have mentioned for the previous yr a 14- or 16-team mannequin that might present 4 automated qualifying spots for the Massive Ten and SEC every, two every for the ACC and Massive 12, one for the Group of 5 and one or three at-larges. Notre Dame might additionally robotically qualify if it meets a selected rating threshold.
The Massive Ten and SEC have way more management over the CFP starting in 2026, as a part of a memorandum of understanding the conferences signed final yr. That settlement ensures the vast majority of CFP cash goes towards the Massive Ten and SEC, with the remaining for the ACC, Massive 12 and Group of 5 leagues. The burden of every league’s vote just isn’t clear but, however unanimity will now not be required.
GO DEEPER
CFP leaders comply with framework by means of a minimum of ’31; enlargement on maintain
Petitti and Sankey have mentioned little to nothing publicly in regards to the 4-4-2-2-1-1 thought, however it could open the door to these leagues doubtlessly creating play-in tournaments inside their conferences for these playoff spots — additional video games that might be bought to a broadcaster for extra media rights income. It might additionally open a Massive Ten-SEC soccer scheduling settlement.

GO DEEPER
SEC, Massive Ten discussing modifications to championship weekend
These postseason concepts have created public backlash, together with from ESPN’s Paul Finebaum, over such a public tilting of the CFP desk towards two leagues.
“We talked about it, however we didn’t come to selections,” Clark mentioned of extra automated qualifiers. “It’s on the market (within the media) and so it got here up within the dialog, however there was no resolution.”
Some commissioners refused to say something in regards to the automated qualifier thought and their ideas on it. Phillips, when requested to weigh what’s good for the ACC and good for the game, mentioned it’s each.
“For all of us, there’s been any person earlier than us and there will probably be any person after us,” he mentioned. “No matter you do, you need to take note of each. You need to serve your constituents, however you’ll be able to’t be fully oblivious and never aware about what’s good for faculty soccer, what’s good for the followers and what you’re listening to from them.”
The commissioners hope to satisfy once more in March, earlier than their annual evaluation assembly in April. It’s potential the longer term CFP modifications might be hammered out over video calls, as was the case final yr.
However whereas the game’s leaders talk about potential overhauls to the season as soon as once more, they proceed to take action privately, with little public informing or lobbying over what they suppose ought to occur.
“The evolution of this factor is essential,” American Athletic Convention commissioner Tim Pernetti mentioned. “We’re coming off a extremely good yr. Now we have numerous momentum on numerous fronts, and it’s essential that we’re speaking about its evolution sooner or later. However my place has at all times been the identical. As we glance to the longer term, we take a look at increasing the entry. As long as entry expands for everybody, I believe that’s essential to the playoff and I believe essential to what followers need to see from the playoff.”
Required studying
(Picture: Peter Joneleit / Icon Sportswire through Getty Photographs)