Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL Multi Tester Review 10 Comparisons

Article by Reed Breuer, Renee Krusemark, Mike Postaski  and Sam Winebaum

Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL ($160)

Introduction

Sam: Lately gravel or “GRVL”  is all the fashion in biking and now operating. Not clean pavement and not likely path. “gravel” might be regarded as these roads and trails which are clean however with some gravel and bumps alongside the way in which requiring a bit extra traction than a highway shoe.  By and enormous gravel oriented sneakers have further traction and a considerably extra supportive higher than their highway counterparts. 

That is precisely what Salomon has achieved with the Aero Glide 3 GRVL. They take their new excessive stack, very gentle, supercritical TPU foam Aero Glide 3 highway shoe (RTR Overview) and added extra substantial traction (for certain wanted even on highway in comparison with the Aero Glide highway’s shaky moist traction) and a considerably extra substantial higher (once more even with its highway focus the Aero Glide 3 might use extra assist).  Learn our evaluate to learn how it turned out as we ran “gravel” and extra in California, Utah, Idaho, Nebraska and New Hampshire.

Execs:

Sturdy stack/weight ratio: Renee/Reed/Sam/Mike P

Comfy higher and midsole: Renee/Reed/Sam/Mike PComfy lockdown and lacing: ReedNo speed-laces!: Reed

Bouncy & enjoyable midsole! Mike P

Cons:

Too gentle for uneven terrain: Renee/Reed/Sam/Mike PLugs not pronounced sufficient for nearly any mud: Reed/Renee

Higher foothold/safety shouldn’t be there given stack peak and softness of midsole, might use extra midfoot assist for path: Sam/Mike P

Deep central carveout helps scale back weight & will increase softness/bounce however hinders path stability: Sam

Not usable in reasonable+ trails (with out excessive warning): Mike P

Most comparable sneakers 

Aero Glide 3

Scarpa Golden Gate ATR 2

Pegasus Path 5

Saucony Trip TRHoka Challenger ATR 7

On Cloudsurfer PathHoka Mafate XAsics Novablast TR

Please discover the testers full run bios on the finish of the article after Comparisons.

Stats

Approx. Weight: males’s 9.45 oz / 268g

  Pattern Weights: 

  males’s  9.2 oz / 261g US8.5, 10.5  oz / 297g US M11, 9.7 oz / 276g US 9.5

  ladies’s 8.92 oz / 253g (proper) 8.59 oz / 243g (left)  US8  

Stack Top: males’s  40mm heel / 32mm forefoot (mm  drop spec) 

Platform Width: 90mm heel / 75mm midfoot / 110mm forefoot US8.5

First Impressions, Match and Higher

Reed: Having not worn a Salomon highway shoe for a number of years, and having solely worn a few their path sneakers of the final couple years, the Aero Glide 3 GRVL actually stands out immediately. It’s thick, it’s gentle, it’s gentle, it’s American for certain. Instantly upon lacing up the shoe you get the impression that consolation was the precedence. The absolutely gusseted neoprene-ish higher settles properly over my foot and the laces safe simply. 

Wanting on the higher you’d suppose it leaned extra path/hybrid however it looks like a typical max cushion highway coach higher. The toe bumper shouldn’t be overly powerful though I query why it’s obligatory in any respect. The forefoot is satisfactorily roomy though not vast – my low-volume foot has loads of room but in addition feels safe within the shoe with no need to fuss with the lacing an excessive amount of. The heel counter is very cushioned and really snug. It’s not stiff however has sufficient construction to safe the heel in place atop the excessive stack of sentimental foam.

Renee: Reed has description of the higher. The safety is extra highway centered than path, and that’s the shoe’s meant terrain. For gravel operating, suppose extra of clean bike paths than hilly, tough roads. The higher is snug however it doesn’t have the overlays or safety for something uneven. For sizing, I counsel trying on the EU dimension as an alternative of US sizing.  My ladies’s dimension 8 runs lengthy and it’s an EU 40, which is a bigger dimension than most US to EU sizes. If between half sizes, positively go together with the shorter dimension.

 

Mike P: Coming of the considerably disappointing testing of the S/LAB Extremely Glide (presumably resulting from over-hype), the preliminary step in really feel of the Aero Glide GRVL was a pure revelation!  I knew immediately that the brand new Power Foam EVO is clearly one thing particular.  We noticed such a beaded TPU setup throughout Salomon’s mannequin line at TRE (Aero Blaze, Pulsar Path) – however seeing it, and feeling it in hand, doesn’t do justice to the step in really feel! 

So gentle, a lot bounce, very gentle weight!  I most likely ought to be speaking about this down within the midsole part, however this was actually my trustworthy FIRST impression of the shoe.  The factor that popped into my thoughts was that if the Relieve Spheres of the S/LAB Extremely Glide have been a little bit of a miss, this new Salomon midsole will probably be a HIT!

Reed and Renee have coated the small print of the higher, so I’ll simply reiterate that it does appear extra highway or “gravel” centered by way of foothold and stability.  With consolation throughout, it’s fairly obvious that it’s not likely designed for technical trails, and even reasonable trails for that matter.. Extra on that within the Trip part afterward. 

So far as sizing, I’m comfortable with a US 9.5, as I used to be within the Extremely Glide – the uppers are considerably comparable in that there’s a plushness to them on the within, particularly the neoprene tongue setup. 

I feel that design works right here for a “gravel”-oriented shoe, however I feel it’s too insecure for the extra trail-focused Extremely Glide. I detect a contact of pinky facet stress as I get with some Salomon toeboxes, however it didn’t change into a trouble on any of my check runs, simply noticeable.  

The foot does sink in a bit to the gentle eTPU, in order that doubtless saves it from being a difficulty. I might advocate sticking with true to dimension in these, as sizing up would doubtless make the shoe really feel even much less safe than it already is.

Sam: The others have stated it nicely. The GRVL is for certain extra highway (clean grime and pavement) centered than path centered. The deep 40/32 stack peak, gentle bouncy foam, deep central carveout and comfy, gentle and evenly supportive higher all level to the roads greater than the paths. 

Sure, the higher with its further overlays and extra foot holding tongue is extra supportive than the highway Aero Glide 3 (RTR Overview) however Salomon might need chosen a much less pliable, extra particles sort mesh right here to enhance path foothold efficiency.

Whereas the ankle collars look substantial they’re gentle and fairly pliable (and for certain tremendous snug) with the heel counter semi inflexible, and even with the rising midsole Energetic Chassis facet partitions, I want for extra rear construction for path makes use of.

The toe bumper whereas substantial trying and in depth is kind of gentle and pliable

The match is true to dimension for me, very gentle on the foot and comfy with no points for highway gravel makes use of and is considerably extra supportive than the Aero Glide 3’s however extra highway than any type of extra technical trails centered.  I might not dimension up right here even with a wider increased quantity foot and there may be loads of give to the higher.

Midsole & Platform

Reed: I examined these sneakers with out figuring out any particulars concerning the new Power Foam EVO it looks like that is only a increased cushion coach utilizing a bouncy however not responsive foam reminiscent of expanded TPU. And that’s what the midsole is an expanded beads supercritical eTPU foam.  It jogs my memory of the Saucony Triumph or Craft Professional Endur (now referred to as Endurance 2.0). Specs say the midsole is Salomon’s Power Foam and I’m undecided in the event that they produce it in various densities or with totally different foaming mechanisms (this appears like a beaded foam which differs from different Salomon Power Foam formulations I’ve seen). In any case, the Power Foam used right here feels bouncy and energetic. In highway shoe phrases, the broad however not overly vast platform has sufficient inherent stability to fulfill most individuals no matter gait. Path stability is one other matter for later!

Renee: I agree with Reed concerning the midsole feeling bouncy not responsive. Really, “overly gentle” works as a greater descriptor than bouncy. I can see how the shoe can be an important choice for simple runs or lengthy runs when consolation and softness is required underfoot. Between the stack and softness, it’s not a shoe I can put on to select up the tempo. These qualities additionally make the shoe uncomfortable on uneven surfaces, which I focus on extra within the experience part. It’s not all dangerous information: if you happen to want consolation underfoot on clean, buff surfaces, the Glide GRVL is a good alternative.

Mike P: As I talked about earlier – the midsole is the place the magic occurs right here – A fairly thick slab of Power Foam EVO – 40/32mm, but extremely versatile all through.  No interference from provider foams or any sort of plate.  Even the outsole the way in which it’s arrange – flexes a lot as to not intrude with the bounciness of the eTPU foam.

I discover this shoe, and particularly the texture of the midsole extraordinarily pleasing to run on – in the fitting context in fact.  I pushed them a bit of bit in some rockier and positively uneven terrain throughout my final check run (Test it out @HumbleRunning!), and was keenly conscious of their limitations. The midsole simply desires to bounce in any route, and mixed with the extra comfort-oriented higher, it truly is finest suited to flatter or at the least stage trails.

The unimaginable facet of this midsole is how Salomon was in a position to maintain the burden so low (9.7 oz is superb for 40/32mm underfoot) whereas sustaining that TPU bounce, and on the identical time not feeling prefer it’s bottoming out.

Sam: Salomon’s new eTPU Power Foam EVO for certain makes the GRVL a lightweight shoe for its massive 40/32 stack peak. Gentle and really energetic, it looks like different TPU foams (reminiscent of Saucony PWRRUN+) in its bouncy return that additionally appears to “escape” the edges of the midsole considerably, so it’s not notably “taut” or secure in really feel.  

The sunshine weight of the shoe at 9.2 oz / 261g US8.5 for a lot stack peak is for certain felt on the run. It’s enjoyable to run on clean surfaces for certain if even they’re not notably secure.

The sensation of energetic softness is accentuated by the deep central carveout underfoot. I feel, whereas fantastic on highway, filling this space in  or making the froth barely firmer/ denser would enhance path efficiency. 

The rear rising “Energetic Chassis” foam sidewalls do assist stabilize preliminary heel landings considerably however I might not name the GRVL a stability/assist centered platform, and even on highway, the place most devoted path sneakers are secure. 

Outsole

Reed: I’m certain Salomon confronted inner debate over the outsole for this mannequin. They settled on what seem like 2mm chevron lugs throughout the outer rim of the shoe with some small hexagonal dots forming a waffle sample underneath the forefoot.

 There’s most likely no profitable anyway as a result of all people goes to interpret what a “gravel shoe” ought to be based mostly on their very own surroundings. Within the biking trade the place “gravel” was popularized as a class, the bikes actually aren’t meant for precise unfastened gravel as a result of no tire sample can grip a unfastened floor of small rocks. 

Gravel bikes are highway bikes with modified tires and geometry that principally operate as highway bikes which have the aptitude to deal with rougher roads and infrequently a path that you just wouldn’t dare to take your highway bike on. I feel the Aero Glide 3 GRVL truly fits that class very precisely, which suggests it doesn’t fairly match the mould of typical “hybrid” path/highway trainers. 

Like gravel bikes, the Aero Glide 3 GRVL is a highway shoe with good advertising. It has no extra “path” options than many highway every day trainers throughout the trade, however I’d argue it’s an unimaginable all-road every day coach. I haven’t examined the non-gravel Aero Glide 3 however I might guess that I might use the GRVL model for something the highway model would do, and extra.

Renee: Reed has dialogue concerning the semantics of a gravel shoe, and why not have that dialogue within the outsole part! Within the case of the Aero Glide 3 GRVL it’s not the identical as most hybrid or road-to-trail sneakers (see the comparability listing). This can be a highway shoe with barely bigger lugs than the highway model. The shoe gained’t be able to terrain that the road-specific model can’t additionally deal with. That’s not the outsole’s fault, it’s a mixture of the outsole, gentle midsole, stack, and higher. When it comes to traction, there could be some however I couldn’t discover given the midsole’s softness. Not the very best for mud, to state the apparent. Gravel gained’t get trapped in between the lugs as a result of they’re so small, so there’s an asset there. Mud will lure within the cutout space nonetheless.  

Sam: The outsole with its bars offers first rate traction for its meant gravel makes use of whereas not getting in the way in which or being overly current on pavement.  The protection is across the perimeter with the massive central cutout uncovered. Whereas this method softens the experience and offers the GRVL good flexibility together with the gentle foam it impactsm rougher  path stability and utility.

Mike P:  I feel “gravel” path operating is “a factor” within the sense that – path trainers do have lugs for a motive.  I discover that on the sandy and grime trails that I usually run on, even a small quantity of lug depth underfoot is preferable to a flat highway outsole. You get that right here at 2.5mm – it’s by no means designed for technical and even reasonable trails – so take that into consideration.

I just like the design of what I’d name “bike tire rails” alongside the sides of the shoe.  With the midsole being so flexy, I discover that these rails – particularly on the lateral facet on my foot touchdown – contour nicely over the bottom and provides a clean touchdown.  After all this isn’t an important characteristic for lots of rougher trails, however once more, context (GRVL). 

Trip, Conclusions and Suggestions

Trip (50%): Match (30%): Worth (15%): Fashion (5%):  

New Smiles Enjoyable  Rating!  Out of 5 This rating is about how pleasing/enjoyable the expertise is on the run, or within the case of race sort sneakers how efficient it’s to race.

😊😊😊😊😊(copy paste as many smiles as you want)

Renee: The Glide GRVL will work finest for very clean or buffed gravel or grime. The midsole is gentle, so I didn’t discover the experience snug on tough or uneven gravel or service roads. Similar with muddy or gentle surfaces: the midsole is just too gentle to take care of a strong touchdown on something remotely uneven. The Glide GRVL is finest just for very nicely maintained roads or gravel (see photograph under). 

I might not advocate the GRVL for single monitor path. The shoe can deal with some tough landings, as in thick service highway rock or snow, however operating a number of miles of that sort of floor shouldn’t be snug. My longest run with the shoe was solely 14 miles for that motive. The midsole stack is snug sufficient for lengthy distances, however solely on clean terrain. 

I see a worth in gravel particular sneakers as a result of I reside on gravel roads and rarely run pavement. When the roads are maintained, I exploit a highway shoe. When they’re tough, I exploit a path shoe. Gravel sneakers may occupy a small center floor of being helpful in summer season months.

I like to recommend the GRVL for many who are in search of a gentle midsole, simple day shoe on clean terrain. For scoring I’m factoring in standards that I might count on from a shoe meant for greater than paved roads. 

Renee’s Rating: 8.6/10

Trip 8, Match 9, Traction 8.5, Worth 8.5, Fashion 9 

Sam : The GRVL is clearly a “highway” shoe, with improved traction. Gentle, enjoyable and energetic on very clean trails and roads it struggles off the crushed path. And that’s OK as Salomon has loads of different path centered sneakers and within the class of highway and path versatility the wonderful S/Lab Extremely Glide and Glide Max. Its experience might be stated to hitch others within the “enjoyable” highway shoe class (gentle and energetic) reminiscent of ASICS Novablast or Mizuno Neo Zen however right here with further traction.

Salomon’s very gentle. gentle and bouncy eTPU Power Foam EVO certain will get greater agency surfaces smiles from me than their older Power Foam (EVA/OBC) mix however as applied right here (deep central carveout and peripheral outsole) it retains the GRVL off all however clean trails for me. The consolation  focus is accentuated by the gentle and fairly unstructured higher. A much less stretchy and pliable higher mesh, barely denser foam and/or adjustments to the underfoot geometry I feel might go a great distance in direction of mitigating the underfoot softness and relative instability, thus rising the shoe’s versatility.

In comparison with the highway centered Aero Glide I see the GRVL as improved in foot maintain and considerably in stability given its outsole and of the 2 I choose the GRVL even on highway and even when it weighs considerably extra.

If  you’re in search of an excellent snug bouncy gentle experience for mellow terrain, metropolis park runs, rail trails and velocity strolling it’s a fantastic alternative.

Sam’s Rating: 9.1 / 10

Scoring as a “principally” highway (be it pavement or clean grime) shoe. Deductions for underfoot softness/ Instability and higher maintain for off highway uneven terrain makes use of which limits  its versatility

Reed: I agree with Renee’s evaluation that the GRVL doesn’t deal with uneven footing nicely. In case your native trails have only a few rocks and no steep grades, this shoe will fare fantastic in dry situations (as would most highway trainers). I’m certain I’ll put on these in the summertime right here in Auburn, CA with our famously non-technical trails with little problem. The final couple summers I wore highway sneakers continuously on our trails for each simple runs and exercise days, and the GRVL will probably be one other simple option to seize for any of my common routes. Street Rating: 9.13 /10

Trip 9.0, Match 9.5, Worth 9.0, Fashion 8.5 (Reed) 

Path Rating: 8.53 /10 

Trip 9.0, Match 9.5, Worth 9.0, Fashion 8.5, Traction 5.0, Rock Safety 9.0,

Mike P: I’m on board the GRVL prepare – at the least the way in which that Salomon has formulated it right here with this Aero Glide 3 selection.  Take a extremely enjoyable highway shoe, slab some gentle lugs on it for easy-ish trails, don’t overdo the higher, and maintain the burden down.  If these are the features you’d need in a “gravel” shoe for path operating – I feel Salomon nails it right here.

Sure, there are a couple of features of the shoe that could possibly be improved.  I feel they might do a contact extra for stability with out gaining weight.  Possibly some overlays or one thing totally different across the midfoot to at the least really feel a bit higher safety there. Maybe it’s simply too tough given the gentle/bouncy nature of the midsole beneath.  They may additionally spherical out the toebox a bit – I can see some feeling that Salomon pinky-side pinch with these.

However all-in-all, this is without doubt one of the most enjoyable sneakers you may run in – the texture underfoot is simply that good.  Gentle trails, rail trails, door-to-trail, gravel, no matter you wish to name it – this is a wonderful and for me, prime choose for that sort of operating. If you wish to veer off and have some vary into legit trails, you’ll want one thing else, and there are a lot of choices on the market. However Salomon nails this one, and I can’t wait to see how they incorporate this foam into different fashions. 

Mike P’s Rating:  9.28 / 10

Trip: 10 – Love that eTPU bounce!

Match: 8 – Undoubtedly leans consolation over safety

Worth: 10 – Very enjoyable shoe at an honest worth level

Fashion: 10 – Seems cool, can’t wait to see different colours!

Traction: 9.5 – Good for gravel and lightweight trails, contours nicely

Rock Safety: 9.5 – Deep midsole soaks up gravel, avoid actual rocks

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

10 Comparisons

Aero Glide 3 (RTR Overview)

Sam: The highway Glide 3 shares the identical midsole foam. stack peak and platform with, basic outsole structure and higher match. A lighter shoe, It differs in having a much less supportive and but extra snug higher particularly a midfoot and a much less aggressive outsole which I discovered had not that nice forefoot grip on moist surfaces. It’s clearly pure highway whereas the GRVL can enterprise a bit additional off the pavement. Want the GRVL on this match up. 

S/Lab Extremely Glide (RTR Overview)

Sam: For me each play in the identical extra mellow trails to roads with some gravel thrown in though Salomon positions the Extremely Glide as their extra mellow paces extremely shoe. No contest for me right here, Extremely Glide and this regardless of its $90 increased price ticket. Whereas a mixture of Salomon’s older Power Foam because the outer provider with a core of Power Foam +, a distinct I consider PEBA foam as an alternative of the EVO supercritical TPU making up the entire midsole of the GRVL. 

The experience is extra secure on a 1mm increased stack peak and identical 6mm drop and I discovered extra constant because the foams keep higher in management than the GRVL with the Relieve Spheres underfoot conforming higher to terrain and pavement for a smoother experience whereas the total rubber protection with out deep cutout is extra secure.. Its higher does the job on trails simply fantastic if not fairly very technical trails best as a result of excessive platform. Whereas the GRVL is extra bouncy and “thrilling” it’s much less sensible and versatile. Backside line for me the S/Lab is superior on each path and highway like surfaces though its excessive pricing is difficult to swallow and I’ve considerations about its entrance outsole sturdiness.

VJ Movement (RTR Overview)

Sam: The VJ Movement is decrease stack (35/30) and nearer to 1 oz lighter, is extra versatile and extra agile and has superior traction. 

Additionally with a supercritical foam midsole and I discovered a considerably springier fairly than bouncier one than the GRVL, it’s much less cushioned resulting from its decrease stack peak and extra in depth outsole which is “felt” on exhausting surfaces. Its higher is significantly safer than the extra mellow GRVL’s. The VJ is a greater “path” shoe, notably if  traction is essential (snow, mud)  than the Salomon snf for quick shorter runs  whereas the GRVL is a greater highway and mellow gravel trails and roads shoe. 

Renee: I agree with Sam. The VJ Movement has higher floor really feel due to the stack and firmer midsole, plus the larger lugs are appropriate for precise path. It’s not practically as snug underfoot although. I’d counsel the GRVL for simple or lengthy runs on clean terrain and Movement for gentle mountain climbing. The GRVL ran a half dimension longer for me. 

Scarpa Golden Gate ATR 2 (RTR Overview)

Renee: The GG is marketed as a hybrid shoe, however it’s nice for path because of the bottom really feel and nimble experience. The shoe doesn’t supply a lot safety. If needing stack peak, the GRVL is the higher alternative however at the price of being uncomfortable on something however clean roads. The GRVL runs virtually a half dimension longer. Of be aware, I loved the GG for gravel operating way more. 

Sam: Agree with Renee. The Golden Gate for certain leans extra path resulting from its safer higher and firmer (however not too agency) experience. It’s a more sensible choice in case your “door to path” runs contain extra actual and extra  technical trails than the extra highway and longer distances and clean terrain  oriented GRVL. 

Nike Pegasus Path 5 (RTR Overview)

Reed: The Peg Path is a firmer and extra versatile choice with much less cushion and a standard experience. The AG3 GRVL is a worse path shoe however higher highway shoe.

Renee: The Peg Path 5 is extra versatile for path use as it’s nearer to the bottom and has a firmer midsole. I discovered the earlier Peg Path 4 to be good for single monitor too, though v5 much less so as a result of it misplaced some stability. As Reed wrote, the GRVL is a better option for clean roads. Sizing is analogous with the GRVL being slighter longer. 

Saucony Trip TR (RTR Overview)

Renee: Most likely the closest comparability. The Trip 15 TR is mainly a highway shoe with some small lugs, and so is the GRVL. The midsole of the RIde 15 TR is firmer than the GRVL so I discovered it extra helpful and extra secure on uneven terrain. Neither shoe is nice for single monitor trails. Sizing is analogous, with the GRVL operating a bit longer. 

 Hoka Challenger 7 (RTR Overview)

Reed: The Challenger has been my go-to alternative for simple trails the final two years. The AG3 GRVL is roomier all-around with extra of a highway centered higher. The GRVL is softer however each really feel very clean and environment friendly. If you actually need the hybrid road-to-trail shoe go together with the Challenger however if you happen to actually simply want a highway coach for a mixture of grime and paved roads, go for the Salomon. 

Renee: The Challenger has sufficient stack and safety for an extremely and with the agency midsole, it’s significantly better for path than the GRVL. I don’t discover the Challenger helpful for reasonable or clean terrain so the GRVL has a slight benefit for that terrain. Sizing might be comparable. I’ve a 7.5 within the Challenger and my dimension 8 GRVL felt too lengthy. 

On Cloudsurfer Path (RTR Overview)

Reed: These two choices share virtually the identical performance however you get extra bounce and cushion with the GRVL. The higher and lockdown is noticeably higher with the GRVL. For many who worry the upper stack, the Cloudsurfer Path can deal with the identical situations on the identical worth.

Renee: I agree with Reed. The Surfer Path has a gentle midsole however not as gentle because the GRVL. Stability is healthier within the Surfer Path however neither are nice for precise path or uneven surfaces. For softness and stack on highway, the GRVL has an edge. For the whole lot else, together with informal and strolling use, the Surfer. Sizing is comparable with the GRVL operating a bit longer.

Hoka Mafate X (RTR Preliminary Video Overview)

Reed: TBD if that is really meant for gravel. With the additional $65 you’re getting a extra aggressive outsole, a carbon plate, and a combo of EVA with a PEBA core. The GRVL is extra nice and easy-going and I reckon it’ll be extra snug over the lengthy haul on a gravel or grime highway. No plate wanted.

Asics Novablast TR 

Reed: One other very comparable alternative and arguably in the identical class. No main variations in match or operate right here however you’d get barely higher traction, safety, and sturdiness within the Salomon.

The Aero Glide 3 GRVL will probably be out there April 15, 2025 

Tester Profiles

Reed Breuer, 32 years outdated from Auburn, CA. Reed started operating at age 18 and did the basic monitor/cross nation route by faculty. After faculty he ran a pair highway marathons and began racing on trails in 2017. He moved from Sacramento to Auburn in 2023 to reside nearer to the historic Western States 100 course and he primarily trains and races on trails from 50k to 100mi. He has run a 15:28 5k and a couple of:28 marathon and is domestically aggressive in races of any floor or distance. He manages an area operating shoe retailer and is beginning a training enterprise on the facet (capital-endurance.com). He’s a closeted heel-striker and over-pronator with a really low-volume foot.

Renee is a former U.S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of operating and writing began. She isn’t that superior of a runner, however she tries actually exhausting. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles happen on rural nation roads in Nebraska, which means mud, gravel, grime, hills, and the occasional subject. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and three:26:45 for the marathon.

Mike Postaski at present focuses on lengthy mountainous ultras – wherever from 50K as much as his favourite – 100M. 5’10”, 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker – he sometimes averages 70 mpw (totally on trails), ramping as much as 100+ mpw throughout race buildups. A latest 2:39 highway marathoner, his simple operating tempo ranges from 7:30 – 9:00/mi. From 2022-23 Mike has gained the Standhope 100M, IMTUF 100M, and Scout Mountain 100M path ultras, profitable the Scout 50M in 2024. He additionally set a CR of 123.74M on the Pulse Endurance Runs 24H and accomplished the Boise Trails Problem on foot in 3 days 13 hours, besting the earlier file by 7 hours. Mike’s shoe preferences lean in direction of firmer, dense cushioning, and sneakers with narrower profiles. He prefers further forefoot area, particularly for lengthy ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe bins.

Sam is the Editor and Founding father of Street Path Run. He’s in his 60’s with 2025 Sam’s 53th yr of operating roads and trails. He has a many years outdated 2:28 marathon PR. Lately he runs halves within the simply sub 1:40 vary if he will get very, very fortunate. Sam trains 30-40 miles per week principally at reasonable paces on the roads and trails of New Hampshire and Utah be it on the run, mountain climbing or on nordic skis. He’s 5’9” tall and weighs about 160 lbs, if he isn’t having fun with too many fantastic New England IPA’s.

Feedback and Questions Welcome Beneath! Please tell us mileage, paces, race distances, and present most well-liked sneakers