Additional to yesterday’s submit, through which I pushed George Plimpton’s Y-Foil a.okay.a. The Charity Journey Destroyer to its very limits (or at the least gently nudged it in the direction of the overall neighborhood through which it limits would possibly presumably be discovered)…
…you’ll have famous that the bike has fairly a tall fork crown, which Paul of Traditional Cycle has in comparison with “high-waisted denims:”
I had simply assumed the body should require an unusually proportioned fork as a result of the body is optimized for aerodynamics and blah blah blah, however in response to Y-Foil nerds on the Web it’s as a result of Trek designed the bike to be suitable with a suspension fork:
Immediately after all gravel bike suspension forks have gotten more and more widespread, Lob assist us:
[My gravel bike suspension fork buyer’s guide: Don’t.]
However like so many different concepts in biking which can be at present fashionable, that is nothing new, and for awhile there riders have been even deploying them at Paris-Roubaix:
Anyway, if what I’ve learn is true and the Y-Foil is certainly “suspension-corrected,” this provides a wholly new dimension to its dorkiness, and it’s turning into more and more clear to me that in relation to totally comprehending the character and magnitude of its dorkitude I’ve solely simply barely begun to make out its contours within the fog.
Additionally additional to yesterday’s submit, my completely scientific testing confirmed that George Plimpton’s Y-Foil a.okay.a. The Charity Journey Destroyer is certainly sooner than The Final Dad Bike:
Exhilarated by the joys of discovery, I resolved to speed-test one more bike. However which? La Faggin con Spinerghese? The Cervino with its pro-quality tubular tires and cutting-edge componentry from 1982? However testing but extra street racing bikes simply appeared like splitting hairs. Then it hit me: why not strive one thing totally different, just like the Homer?
Setting out, I knew the Homer could be slower than each the ‘Mond and the ‘Foil. The true query was: How a lot slower wouldn’t it be? So I strapped on a pair of sandals and hit the street. The consequence?
Yeah, that’s proper: whereas the Homer was slower than the Y-Foil, it beat the LeMond by 15 seconds.
How might this be?!? How might the Homer, full with full fenders, touring tires, a headlight sitting on the market within the wind, and 36-spoke wheels (nicely 36 rear, 32 entrance) carry out practically identically to the featherweight LeMond with its minimally-spoked ultralight race wheels? Nicely, I’ve a couple of theories:
Jan Heine is true and wider tires are sooner (even once they’re rugged Schwalbes with reflective sidewalls and never supple Heinian tires)
As a result of aforementioned wider tires, plus the bike’s inherent stability because of its lengthy wheelbase, I used to be capable of experience sooner over the tough sections of the bike path the place the roots are forcing the pavement to buckle
The Homer is extra comfy, and so I used to be capable of spend extra time within the drops
Whereas I actually thought the Homer could be measurably slower, as soon as I acquired began possibly I subconsciously hoped for an upset and thus made extra of an effort with out realizing it
Satirically the handlebars on the Homer are narrower than the bars on each the Y-Foil and the LeMond, so possibly handlebar width is much more necessary than stuff like spoke depend, which will surely clarify why the professionals are using such slender bars nowadays
As an previous, out-of-shape, and balding semi-professional bike blogger, I merely don’t experience quick sufficient to appreciate any of the advantages of aerodynamic bicycle gear
I feel every one among these theories has benefit, however in the end I think it’s that final one which explains like most of what’s occurring right here.
