Former Haas F1 staff boss Guenther Steiner has referred to as for the FIA to rethink the possession of a number of F1 groups after Daniel Ricciardo snatched the quickest lap from Lando Norris on the Singapore GP.
With nothing to lose as a consequence of his monitor place, the Visa Money RB staff determined to offer Daniel Ricciardo one final hurrah shortly earlier than the tip of the Singapore Grand Prix. The Faenza-based outfit introduced him again in, bolted on a set of soppy tyres and despatched him out to chalk up the seventeenth DHL Quickest Lap of his profession.
With a time of 1:34.486, he denied the dominant race winner Lando Norris a possible first Grand Slam. Extra importantly, although, he disadvantaged the McLaren driver and closest title challenger to Max Verstappen of the bonus level.
Talking on the Purple Flags podcast, former Haas F1 staff boss Guenther Steiner stated that Components One must rethink the possession of a number of groups because it all the time carries its personal difficulties concerning equity throughout the sport.
“This quickest lap, it was somewhat bit bizarre when it got here, you realize. I feel that the difficulty there may be that in a sport like Components 1, no proprietor ought to have two groups. You by no means get away from the suspicion that there are staff orders between groups, not simply inside one staff.
“If Sauber would have made the quickest lap, would anyone be frightened about it? No. The issue lies in that it’s owned by the identical house owners.
“I suppose we’ve to respect what Purple Bull did on the time… Minardi was struggling. They’d have gone away and not using a saviour. So F1 has developed lots since them days, and for the longer term, possibly there must be a repair to this one which no person can personal two groups.”
He continued: “However I feel it shouldn’t be as radical as saying, ‘Oh, within the subsequent Concorde Settlement or business settlement, this must be sorted’”
“For the longer term, possibly there must be a repair… Ultimately, you can’t inform them what to do with their groups, however sooner or later, there must be ideas about that.”
F1