VJ Shoes MAXx2 Multi Tester Review: Pure Fun. Versatile. Very Light 10 Comparisons

Outsole

Mike P: Usually with a VJ shoe, this can be a part I might harp on. ensuring you’re conscious that VJ’s Butyl rubber is the highest path rubber in the marketplace. However at this level it’s just about a given, and there’s so many different good issues occurring with this shoe – let’s simply say you’ll be able to take it without any consideration that you just’re going to get top-of-class grip and traction with this shoe. You don’t must spend time poring over the Outsole part.

Sam: My take a look at runs have been on packed snow and on laborious clear surfaces. The grip on snow is superb because of the lug sample. I can actually really feel it chunk after preliminary contact. I do assume Megagrip and Continental rubbers have a contact extra preliminary stick on snow. I might spotlight that on laborious surfaces resembling pavement, even with the 4mm lugs right here, the rubber deforms sufficient because it on the tender facet and shoe has it has good flex shouldn’t be slappy or harsh as say MegaGrip could be on such surfaces pointing to the all terrain versatility when the excellent midsole can be within the combine.

Mike P: Lug depth is 4mm – once more, VJ’s Butyl rubber delivers the products. I’ll simply say that given the general multi-directional flexibility of the shoe- the outsole grips even higher than different VJ fashions. You get extra contouring over the bottom with the improved flexibility of the midsole and the shoe typically.

John: My expertise with the VJ MAXx2’s outsole is just like Mike P and Sam’s observations. I used to be in a position to run on snow, mud, technical path, and street. On snow, the lug sample delivers distinctive grip. The MAXx2 feels extremely safe and confidence-inspiring and likewise handles mud successfully, with the lug spacing stopping extreme caking and sustaining first rate traction. On technical trails with free rocks, roots, and uneven surfaces, the mixture of the lug sample and versatile rock plate offers good grip and stability, permitting for assured navigation with out sacrificing agility. Even on the street, the outsole performs surprisingly effectively. Total, regardless of the 4mm lugs, the rubber compound provides sufficient traction with out feeling harsh or uncomfortable, highlighting the shoe’s versatility and dwelling as much as its fame for glorious grip and efficiency on varied terrains. 

Renee: I ran principally in thick mud throughout testing. I agree with the ideas in regards to the shoe being extra forgiving on packed surfaces than it seems. For a mixture of terrain, that’s appreciated. That mentioned, it gained’t be tremendous comfy off technical or ungroomed terrain for lengthy distances. The platform is a bit slender to be a sluggish cruiser. 

I had mud utterly caked to the outsole and was in a position to proceed working with out stopping to take away the mud. 

Jeff V:  VJ advertises the “Greatest Grip On the Planet” and that in fact holds true right here.  Traction is phenomenal on snowy surfaces, free off path, slabby rocks, moist, dry, you identify it.  The lug sample is aggressive and efficient with a brilliant sticky rubber compound.  Sturdiness has confirmed glorious on all earlier fashions (aside from the unique Extremely attributable to a design flaw that was since corrected within the Extremely 2) and I anticipate the identical right here.

Journey, Conclusions and Suggestions

Sam: I’m recovering from knee surgical procedure in November with 2 titanium screws now on board so my working has been cautious and slower than standard on packed effectively groomed snow, street and  even an indoor observe so will depart the extra technical trails view to Mike and John. I all the time do at the very least some runs in path sneakers on pavement to intently evaluate and consider with out path variabilities. Right here the MAX, whereas under no circumstances a street shoe, was excellent for its energetic cushion, stability regardless of slender platform and versatile fast toe off with far much less of the tough affect of the 4mm outsole than I can recall with different sneakers in its class. 

The mix of energetic cushion and outsole response blends collectively very properly and the sunshine mild weight has then turning over tremendous fast. 

On laborious surfaces, the heel does really feel a bit agency whereas the forefoot is surprisingly effectively cushioned and notably snappy and energetic main me to my “quickest” instances since surgical procedure even in comparison with street trainers. On snow, they grip and climb very effectively whereas on uneven downhills they supply loads of help.

What may enhance it? A bit extra stack top of cushion to increase its vary. That mentioned, given the froth VJ might need to widen the platform some to keep up technical terrain stability including to weight. At $180 it’s on the higher finish of pricing for non carbon plated path sneakers however its efficiency clearly places it in the identical class as Salomon’s S/Lab sneakers.

My conclusion, albeit contemplating restricted terrain selection to date, is that the MAX given its mild weight for cushion and 4mm lug outsole, energetic, quick but steady journey is a best choice in case you are on the lookout for a flexible completely trendy path runner. It might probably deal with any form of terrain as quick or as sluggish as you want, for just about any distance, not often the case with more and more specialised path sneakers. It’s one shoe I hold wanting to achieve for. VJ, for positive a model that masters the extremely technical terrain in addition to any model, now has an choice with far broader enchantment and with many smiles within the combine.

Sam’s Rating: 9.6 /10

Journey: 9.7 – Versatile and enjoyable. Would commerce some weight for extra stack top

Match: 9.8 – Flawless, 

Worth: 9.2 – A bit excessive

Model: 9.0 – Sharp trying however a bit vivid

Traction: 9.7 – Nice grip but comfy and never harsh on agency surfaces

Rock Safety: 9.3 Greater than sufficient for such a light-weight shoe

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

Mike P: In serious about how you can greatest describe the MAXx2 – essentially the most acceptable option to describe it will be this – it’s only a pleasure to run in. My first two runs straight out of the field have been 10+ miles, then 12+ miles. No break-in mandatory, they have been totally versatile and able to rock immediately. My ft felt comfy, and joyful all through, the consolation of the higher actually standing out in my thoughts in comparison with different, “rougher” on the foot VJ fashions. That is actually a contemporary design from VJ, and similar to any of the highest path sneakers in the marketplace proper now.

VJ can be releasing one other mannequin concurrently – the Lightspeed. They gave us steerage that the Lightspeed mannequin leaned extra into idea/”professional” territory, meant to push the boundaries of their new designs. I do discover that the case compared to the MAXx2. The MAXx2 has a wider, extra steady base, clearly extra versatile for just about all trails and all path runners. The Lightspeed additionally has a unique, extra propulsive plate. We can have a separate assessment for the Lightspeed.

 

The MAXx2 is a shoe that you might simply run each day – simple runs, average runs, brief quick runs, lengthy runs, and extremely runs for a lot of. It’s not a max cushion shoe, however someplace within the midrange, so how far you are taking it could rely upon how a lot foam you like underfoot. For lighter runners, resembling myself, that is clearly a mid-distance extremely choice, probably longer. 

So far as terrain, safety is nice, and the shoe is agile sufficient for the shoe to be workable in technical terrain. I’d say the candy spot could be anyplace as much as average/low technical terrain. Past that, the bounciness of the froth may go in opposition to you over prolonged intervals. In serious about essentially the most comparable sneakers (Salomon Genesis, Brooks Catamount 3, Merrell Lengthy Sky 2 Matryx) – these 3 are the are one of the best I can do, however the MAXx2 is extra like a mashup of these 3 sneakers relatively than being just like any single a kind of.

It has the cushion and luxury underfoot of the Genesis, however not fairly as a lot. It has an analogous fast journey to the Catamount, however somewhat bit extra flexy underfoot, and never fairly as a lot straight forward velocity. It has an analogous mild, versatile, and agile really feel because the Lengthy Sky 2 Matryx, however a contact softer underfoot and likewise a bit extra consolation within the higher. These 4 are all nice, high of the road path sneakers – territory that VJ now squarely occupies with the VJ MAXx 2. 

Mike P’s Rating:  9.70 / 10

Journey: 10 – Merely a pleasure to run in 

Match: 9.5 – Minor additional area within the heel for me, odd sizing in comparison with different VJs

Worth: 9 – A bit excessive, however as versatile a shoe as you will discover

Model: 10 – Nice trying shoe

Traction: 10 – VJ’s trademark

Rock Safety: 9.5 – Good and sufficient, matches the profile/journey of the shoe

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

John: The shoe delivers a cushty and responsive journey because of the well-cushioned SuperFoamance midsole. The energetic really feel propels you ahead, whereas the versatile rock plate offers stability and safety with out sacrificing floor really feel. Holding as much as VJ’s fame, the outsole provides glorious grip on various surfaces, from snow and dust to technical trails and even occasional concrete stretches. I’m an enormous fan of this shoe, significantly by way of consolation and higher. The engineered mesh higher has zero stress factors and offers a safe, enveloping comfy match. From my perspective, the MAXx2 is a compelling choice for path runners in search of a cushty, responsive, and versatile shoe. It caters effectively to runners who prioritize consolation, safety, and recognize some pep of their step particularly on the uphills. Whereas the comfortable match won’t go well with everybody, the improved higher ought to accommodate a wider vary of foot shapes.

John’s Rating:  9.35 / 10

Journey: 9 – Strong performer with nice vitality return 

Match: 9.5 – Tremendous comfortable and conforming

Worth: 9 – Very versatile shoe, however not a full road-to-trail

Model: 9 – I believe each shoe ought to have Lime Inexperienced accents

Traction: 10 – Excellent

Rock Safety: 9.5 – Simply sufficient to guard with floor really feel

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

Renee: The MAXx2 is a enjoyable shoe, helpful for ungroomed and sloppy circumstances with out having a “cleat-like” journey. Regardless of the considerably slender look, the match is extra beneficiant and it’s meant to have a safe match. For me, the sizing was a difficulty. I’m between half sizes in lots of manufacturers and fashions, and the forefoot of the MAXx2 creases in an odd spot over my toes. A half dimension smaller is likely to be greatest for runners between half sizes. In the event you just like the VJ sneakers for impediment racing or fell working however need extra consolation underfoot for working (with out compromising velocity), the MAXx2 is an efficient choice. 

Renee’s Rating: 9.0/10 (-.30 sizing, -.50 toebox is shallow, -.20 restricted terrain)

😊😊😊 (total, extra smiles on sloppy circumstances)

Jeff V:  VJ has shortly turn into one in all my favourite manufacturers and the MAXX2 is arms down their greatest mannequin but.  With a cushty and considerably accommodating higher that gives race prepared safety and stability, a light-weight, enjoyable, effectively cushioned steady predictable midsole and unparalleled grippy outsole, the MAXX2 checks all my containers for working quick on steep, technical mountain terrain.  

They’re a lot enjoyable and such a pleasure to run in, be it an informal outing, or cranking up the tempo for PR of race efforts on any terrain, steep gradients, off camber, they’re quick, energetic, efficiency oriented, steady, protecting, effectively cushioned and cozy.  They’re one of many uncommon sneakers that you just placed on, run anyplace, any floor at any velocity and don’t actually consider them in your ft, as they simply appear to combine as a part of your physique.  Nearly all of my testing has been in primarily winter circumstances, however I’m longing for the paths to soften out and get them up into the excessive nation, the place I do know they’ll excel.  If I have been compelled to do away with all of my sneakers and simply hold one pair, I might make a robust case for selecting the MAXX2. 

Jeff V’s Rating:  9.9 / 10

Journey: 10 – For its meant function, the MAXX2 is tops 

Match: 10 – Regardless of the necessity to dimension down a half dimension, when you try this, match is ideal for me, simply accommodating sufficient for all day consolation, but with supreme foothold and stability.

Worth: 10 – Whereas $180 is pricy, it’s not out of line given the efficiency, versatility and enjoyable they supply.

Model: 9 – They appear fairly good, particularly as soon as mudded up a bit.

Traction: 10 – Greatest Grip on the Planet!

Rock Safety: 9.5 – sufficient for technical terrain, but offers simply the fitting stability of path really feel.

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

10 Comparisons

Index to all RTR evaluations: HERE

MAXx2 Stats

31 mm heel / 25 mm forefoot ( 6 mm drop) 

Approx. 8.47 oz  / 240g (US9)

Platform Width: 80 mm heel / 60 mm midfoot / 100 mm forefoot

Brooks Catamount 3 (RTR Evaluation)

males’s 9 oz  / 255g (US9) 

30mm heel / 24mm forefoot ( 6mm drop spec)  

Platform Width: 90mm heel / 73mm midfoot / 120mm forefoot

Mike P (10.0): Catamount’s foam is firmer underfoot, but additionally offers a faster journey – a part of that because of the nature of its SkyVault plate. The Brooks plate appears to offer extra ahead propulsion across the ball of the foot, whereas the VJ plate appears extra versatile for cover, including a small quantity of propulsion, however much less noticeable. The Catamount has a wider, extra steady base and the higher is barely wider on the forefoot. The VJ’s higher is extra compliant, wraps simply as effectively, however maybe a contact much less strapped down than the Cat 3 – very shut although. Clear win in traction/grip for the VJ. MAXx2’s dynamic softness feels actually good and most runners would in all probability want that for day-to-day path working.

Sam: I agree with Mike on all factors. Identical concept, a bit extra shoe and safety for the Brooks however a firmer much less dynamic enjoyable journey.

Renee: Every little thing Mike P. wrote. For sizing, a girls’s 8 within the Catamount 3 is ideal, whereas the MAXx2 felt a bit lengthy inflicting discomfort over my toes. The Catamount is a extra various shoe by way of terrain. 

Jeff V: Agreed with Mike.  Catamount for quicker straight line working on much less technical terrain over longer distances, whereas the MAXX2 is extra of a tech terrain grasp.

VJ Extremely 2 (RTR Evaluation)

males’s 9.5 oz  / 269g US9

Stack Peak: males’s 33 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot 

Mike P (10.5): Once more be aware the acute sizing distinction right here for me. Extremely 2 is listed at a barely larger stack – its foam feels softer initially, nevertheless it’s extra of an ordinary EVA so it packs down over time. It’s nowhere close to as dynamic in really feel because the MAXx 2. Extremely 2 additionally has an embedded rock plate confirmed by VJ as the identical materials in each however  because of the nature of the froth – it feels a lot stiffer than the MAXx 2. It’s extra protecting in very tough stuff, however the MAXx2 is extra comfy in something much less. Extremely 2’s higher is a bit rougher on the foot, the collars are a bit stiff and the toebox tapers a bit. MAXx 2 higher is rather more foot formed and cozy. I’d choose the MAXx2 for all however essentially the most excessive terrain.

Jeff V:  Agreed with Mike.  The Extremely 2 was one in all my faves, however the MAXX2 blows it away on each entrance.

VJ XTRM 2 (RTR Evaluation)

Pattern Weight: males’s US 10.5 10.2 oz  / 288 g

Stack Peak: males’s mm 24 heel / 20 mm forefoot, 4mm drop

Mike P (10.5): XTRM 2 for me is known as a devoted off-trail, “XTRM” terrain choice. It’s the narrowest VJ I’ve run in, stiff and protecting underfoot, with superior traction. It means that you can dance round in XTRM terrain whereas feeling completely protected and safe. That comes at a price although – the shoe doesn’t really feel as runnable in average terrain, is far heavier and likewise the higher is sort of slender and dialed – an excessive amount of for some. The MAXx2 could be unstable within the excessive terrain that the XTRM 2 excels in, however is method higher in all places else.

Jeff V:  Once more agreed with Mike.  I see the XTRM2 higher fitted to softer terrain, shorter distances and maybe higher free terrain grip.  Undoubtedly not as versatile because the MAXX2 and extra area of interest.

NNormal Kjerag (RTR Evaluation)

males’s 7.59 oz / 215g US8.5 given match equal US9  

Stack Peak: males’s 23.5 mm heel / 17.5 mm forefoot (6mm drop spec) 

Mike P (9.5): Kjerag additionally makes use of a supercritical foam (unsure what mix although), nevertheless it does really feel and is by stack top method thinner underfoot and fewer bouncy and dynamic. It’s actually a minimalist path shoe in comparison with most path sneakers. The uppers really feel comparable by way of thickness and density, and the usage of suede-type supplies on the within. There’s extra forefoot area within the Kjerag, however in any other case by way of the midfoot and heel they’re about the identical. The VJ wins in traction/grip, and total the MAXx2 might be a a lot better choice for 99% of path runners.

Sam: Virtually a full ounce lighter the Kjerag has an analogous foam however fairly a bit much less of it so has a firmer journey and a barely extra agile one. Whereas I recognize the broad Kjerag toe field the MAX’s higher is total a bit extra locked down and safe. 

Jeff V:  Whereas I actually just like the Kjerag, I discover it to be somewhat delicate in tech terrain and surprisingly lacks traction, the place the MAXX2 feels extra protecting and fitted to longer distances (all of us can’t be Killian) and blows the Kjerag away in technical terrain with higher traction, safety and safety underfoot (once more, all of us can’t be Killian).

Salomon Pulsar Path Professional (RTR Evaluation)

Mike P (9.5): I say this for each PTP 2 comp – it’s only a actually stiff shoe. That’s the principle and apparent differentiating issue right here too. PTP 2 may be very stiff, downright tippy in uneven terrain, whereas the MAXx2 – rather more flexy and dynamic. PTP 2 does have a pleasant, well-rounded toebox although, one in all Salomon’s greatest. However MAXx2 is a method higher shoe.

Jeff V: The PTP is quick on the uphill if clean, however is downright harsh, slender and tippy.  The MAXX2 kills the PTP in all regards.

Salomon Genesis (RTR Evaluation)

Weight: males’s  9.63 oz / 273g (US9) 

Stack Peak: males’s 30 mm heel / 22 mm forefoot ( drop spec)       

Platform Width:85 mm heel / 70 mm midfoot / 115 mm forefoot

Mike P (9.5): I lately examined the Genesis – it appears like there’s much more cushion underfoot within the Salomon due partially to its broader platform. The froth feels considerably comparable, there simply appears to be extra of it within the Genesis – noticeable underneath the heel. The VJ SuperFoamance does really feel extra responsive. The Genesis has a wider platform, making it really feel good and tender, but steady underfoot, very versatile in mileage and length. It’s possible extra comfy than the MAXx 2 over longer durations. The VJ feels extra agile, and admittedly, extra enjoyable to run in for many common runs. VJ’s outsole with its extra spaced out lugs provides higher traction. Each are nice sneakers and I’ve them each in rotation.

Sam: As Mike says. The Salomon is relatively mushy as it’s softer, about 1.2 oz / 34g heavier and  much less responsive with its broader platform making it extra steady, extra deeply cushioned and fewer agile and enjoyable. 

Jeff V:  The Genesis is superb and nice for nearly every part, and feels extra cushioned and protecting for longer distances on barely much less tech terrain, but when eager to go tremendous quick in a shorter to mid distance technical race or PR effort, the MAXX2 is the best choice.

Merrell Lengthy Sky 2  (RTR Evaluation)

Approx. Weight: males’s 8.6 oz  / 244g (US9)   

Full Stack Peak: males’s 30 mm heel (measured / 26 mm forefoot ( 4mm drop spec) 

Platform Width:85 mm heel / 65 mm midfoot / 105 mm forefoot 

A contact (0.11 oz heavier), virtually the identical stack top, considerably  wider platform, about the identical outsole depth, perhaps a contact extra. Why so shut in weight? the Matryx higher is lighter.

Mike P (9.5): One among my 3 closest comps – it’s just like the VJ in that it’s a light-weight, very versatile, no-nonsense, form of a throwback path shoe. It’s very trendy although – and its Matryx higher will get the sting over the VJ by way of safe foothold and likewise breathability. VJ wins out within the midsole division  although – it simply feels softer and extra dynamic as compared. 

The Merrell holds it personal for enjoyable issue although attributable to its mild weight which may be very near the VJ’s  The one unfavourable issue with the LS 2 is the heel space – a bit stiff in opposition to the again of the heel and likewise the collar is free, letting particles in. That challenge offers the general edge to the MAXx 2.

LaSportiva Prodigo (RTR Evaluation)

John: Prodigio is a good alternative for long-distance runners who desire a comfy and cushioned shoe. MAXx2 is an efficient choice for runners who desire a responsive and agile shoe with nice floor really feel that’s perfect for technical terrain.

Topo MTN Racer (RTR Evaluation)

Mike P (9.5): Simply as versatile and tender feeling underfoot – however the Topo Zipfoam can’t compete with the SuperFoamance of the VJ. The VJ simply feels a lot extra dynamic underfoot. The MTN Racer 3 soaks up miles, feels very comfy, particularly if you need that extensive toebox, however shouldn’t be as a lot “enjoyable” because the MAXx2. The VJ additionally appears to have higher rock safety. MTN Racer 3 has no plate (I’m joyful for that), so generally you’ll be able to really feel some terrain underfoot given its flexibility. The MAXx2’s plate is versatile virtually to the purpose of not feeling it, which is nice. The VJ is a greater total shoe, however I nonetheless like and suggest the MTN Racer 3 for comfy coaching miles.

Renee: Once more, Mike P. is aware of his sneakers. The MTN Racer 3 has extra stack and luxury for longer distances and a extra accommodating higher. The MAX is safer and quicker, and has a “enjoyable” issue. The MTN Racer 3 is a extra various shoe for me on various terrain. 

Saucony Peregrine (RTR Evaluation)

9.62 oz  /  271g US9

Stack Peak: males’s 28mm heel / 24 mm forefoot 4 mm drop

Barely decrease heel greater than an oz. heavier, non supercritical foam midsole

Mike P (9.5): The most recent Peregrine fell into form of a no-man’s land for me. Not fairly excessive sufficient to be a high-stack choice, but excessive sufficient and never steady sufficient to be a quicker choice. Its greatest utilization for me was average distance, simple coaching miles, of which there are lots of choices on the market. That being mentioned, for that situation, the MAXx2 is a a lot better and far more enjoyable choice. It additionally has far more vary in different areas resembling quicker working and longer, and technical working. I can’t consider a situation the place I’d select the Peregrine over the MAXx 2. 

Renee: The Peregrines are one in all my favourite sneakers (variations 12 and 13). The shoe feels lighter and extra runnable. The MAXx2 has a safer higher and a extra helpful outsole for tremendous muddy circumstances. I can see the MAXx2 being extra helpful for technical terrain for expert runners, however for me, the Peregrine can be utilized for mainly something. 

John: The MAXx2 is a cushty and versatile path shoe, emphasizing balanced cushioning, responsiveness, and grip on various terrains. The Peregrine X, then again, caters to performance-oriented runners in search of a light-weight really feel, larger vitality return, and glorious traction on technical trails. The middle of gravity and floor really feel of the MAXx2 offers me extra confidence in technical terrain in comparison with the Peregrine and I might use the Saucony extra for runnable trails. 

Saucony Xodus Extremely (RTR Evaluation)

Mike P (9.5): The XU 2 may be very near the Peregrine 13 – I believe Saucony overlapped the sneakers an excessive amount of. It’s somewhat larger and somewhat wider, and that’s about it. I do assume it’s a greater choose over the Peregrine attributable to these elements. In comparison with the MAXx 2, there’s extra cushion underfoot, and if the match feels comfy for you, it might be a greater choice for longer, average path runs. The VJ is once more extra dynamic underfoot although, and extra versatile in shorter/quicker working. It additionally has lengthy vary rivaling the XU 2 relying in your choice for quantity of cushion underfoot.

 

Obtainable at our companions beneath quickly

Tester Profiles

Mike Postaski presently focuses on lengthy mountainous ultras – anyplace from 50K as much as his favourite – 100M. 5’10”, 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker – he usually averages 70 mpw (totally on trails), ramping as much as 100+ mpw throughout race buildups. A latest 2:39 street marathoner, his simple working tempo ranges from 7:30 – 9:00/mi. From 2022-23 Mike has gained the Standhope 100M, IMTUF 100M, and Scout Mountain 100M path ultras. He additionally set a CR of 123.74M on the Pulse Endurance Runs 24H and accomplished the Boise Trails Problem on foot in 3 days 13 hours, besting the earlier report by 7 hours. Mike’s shoe preferences lean in direction of firmer, dense cushioning, and sneakers with narrower profiles. He prefers additional forefoot area, particularly for lengthy ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe containers.

John Tribbia (5′ 6″, 130lbs) is a former sponsored mountain/path runner who has run with La Sportiva, Brooks/Fleet Toes, Pearl Izumi, and Salomon. Regardless that he competes much less ceaselessly as of late, you’ll be able to nonetheless discover John having fun with the day by day grind of working on any floor, although his favourite terrain is 30-40% grade climbs. He has gained races resembling America’s Uphill, Imogene Go Run, and the US Skyrunner Vertical Kilometer Sequence; and he is held a number of FKTs on a number of iconic mountains in Boulder, Colorado and Salt Lake Metropolis, Utah. In the event you observe him on Strava, you will discover he runs at various paces between 5 minutes/mile to 12 minutes/mile earlier than the break of daybreak virtually each day.

Jeff Valliere likes to run and discover the mountains of Colorado, the steeper and extra technical the higher. He has summited the entire 14ers within the state and could be discovered on mountain trails day by day, regardless of the climate, season, circumstances or whether or not there’s daylight or not.  On the facet he likes to ski (all varieties) bike and hike, usually along with his household, as he introduces his 12 12 months previous daughters to the outside. Jeff was born and raised in New Hampshire, however has known as Colorado dwelling for over 25 years. He’s 5’9” and 145 lbs.

Renee is a former U.S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of working and writing began. She isn’t that superior of a runner, however she tries actually laborious. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles happen on rural nation roads in Nebraska, which means mud, gravel, dust, hills, and the occasional discipline. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and three:26:45 for the marathon.

Sam is the Editor and Founding father of Street Path Run. He’s 66 with a 2018 3:40 Boston qualifier. 2022 was Sam’s fiftieth 12 months of working. He has a a long time previous 2:28 marathon PR. Nowadays he runs halves within the simply sub 1:40 vary if he will get very very fortunate. Sam trains 30-40 miles per week principally at average paces on the roads and trails of New Hampshire and Utah be it on the run, climbing or on nordic skis. He’s 5’9” tall and weighs about 164 lbs, if he isn’t having fun with too many positive New England IPA’s.